There probably are more qualified candidates but we know that being nominated by the party is caused by other options. Certainly there are better Republican candidates than Trump.
Lol, now you're resorting to childish mocking. C'mon. If I posted 100 bad things about Kamala, you must've posted 1000 about Trump. You're obviously hyper-partisan. Do you really think Kamala is a flawless candidate? As I've said before, countless times, the election is a choice between two bad options. Anyway, we finally squeezed a semi-reasonable post out of you here: It took long enough. I'm glad you're finally admitting that the sitting admin may have to suffer consequences of outcomes they're only partially responsible for. That's just life.
Lol, hyper-partisan. You may as well be a racist or sexist. Don't the Democrat governors ask for money?
I never said “I’m voting for the lesser of two evils.” You did. vanzandt asked me about Kamala’s approval ratings. You accuse me of being hyper partisan but you’ve never said anything good about Kamala and you try to take the high ground about how you aren’t partisan. so you should post 10 nice things about Kamala and 10 bad things about trump. Otherwise you are hyper partisan.
More qualified than Trump, for example? WTF do you care about polling if she's not getting your vote?
You still don't understand where I'm coming from... I'm most likely to post 100 bad things about all of them without a single nice word for either. Read a book.
The popular vote digital is trading at 75/100. Been as high as 80. Kamala will win by more than 7MM votes. Muttley could do better?