Objections to SCT

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to quantify because I only trade patterns that work on multiple tradables, not to mention EOD.

 

So why aren't you working on something that works?

 

you sure are quick on new handles

 

hmmm, that's 9 months from now.
Did you become pregnant?

 

Well, if Jack was involved, then it was surely an Immaculate Conception. (Perhaps there is something to the "always in" strategy, after all.)

 

Objection to SCT:

Its gurus and adherents depend on junk psychology.

 

I think that "garage sale psychology" gives it a nicer slant.

 

Boy, that is some extensive testing regarding SCT. I guess your objections to SCT are based on the PVT work... and CW of course.

Right now, my objection to SCT is it is too complex, easier to trade a simpler strategy and add contracts as the account builds.

 

Same moron, different handle....

 

Perhaps you cannot READ, this thread is about SCT and has nothing to do w/ equities. Yeesh, get a clue!!