EXACTLY ! Feeding the greed, promises of unlimited wealth , very cheap tactics to seduce newbies, he is indeed the biggest forum FAKER, POLLUTER I ever met. Jack, One would think that at your age you had some wisdom to share........
I'm not defending Jack one bit, if he chooses to take this much abuse thats his perogative. What I AM doing is laughing my ass off at you, the LOSER who has spent 10 years keeping tabs on Jack!!
Allow me to spell it out for you since you appear to have comprehension issues. I linked to this P & L. You then claimed the following ... I asked (numerous times) for you to clarify your remarks - specifically to post your proof that the P & L linked above was sued with a papertrading account. Instead of answering, you linked to a discussion which discussed this other P & L. I'll ask the question again, since you seem to consistently find a way not to answer. Do you have evidence that the P & L I linked to above was used in a Demo Account? Yes or No? If yes, post it, if no, say so. It's really that easy. - Spydertrader
Whoops! Looks like I didn't proof read that one before sending it to the board. Thanks for pointing it out for me. - Spydertrader
The boss picked up a Mk IV LBFM on Manhattan Beach after breakfast this morning, so he's out for the duration. Which gives me an opportunity to post: Objection #17: This is a variation on my perennial perineal bitch that the eyes are so drawn to channels that you don't see the meaning of the underlying price action. This specific objection is similar, that you don't notice that those FTTs, BOs and FBOs tend to occur at single or multiple resistance: round numbers, VWAP, prior highs/lows, fib retraces, MAs, today's and yesterday's O/H/L/C, etc. Now would you rather be lazing around while you wait for price to get to where you KNOW it's at least going to pause, or would you rather be GUESSING what the relationship of price is going to be to that imaginary line you drew?
Sure you're defending Jack, by attempting to change the subject... typical misdirection tactic. Do you do it because you know how it feels to have your phoney trading claims questioned? I'm a loser? This from the guy who can't trade in real life so he logs onto the internet and pretends he can. ROTFLMAO!!!
Are you are you NOT still here ARGUEING??? After 10 yrs of keeping tabs, you're still here fighting the good fight...haha, what a LOSER
I hesitate to post this, because it is IMO the principal objection. If Hypo already posted it, I apologize, I don't read his shit because he's a CFI. Objection #18. Think about it. At the trendline, you don't know if it is going to BO or FBO (anti-Jackers, excuse my use of Jackese, but I have to keep it simple so the Jackers can understand), so you HAVE to wait for the move to be clear so you can reverse or take your finger off the keyboard. When it pops, it's going to pop by 3+ ticks. Same for an FTT, ya gotta wait for a "significant" pop before you take the reverse. So here's my objection. If in two out of three formations you're going to lose a lot of the move anyway, why not instead of this channel bullshit, just trade "significant" reverses. Now admittedly, the definition and detection of "significant" is a bitch to get right, but that's why the boss hired me.
I feel your pain, Spyder. It can be quite frustrating when someone refuses to definitively prove an allegation.