Objections to SCT

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Joe Doaks, Mar 19, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lots of good points! But I think Jack's empty, pompous claims are better described as flatulent boasts.
     
    #481     Mar 24, 2007
  2. I appreciate the time you spent formulating such a long post. However, rather than parse each paragraph and craft a response, let me just say this:

    Jack posted this P & L three years ago from a session in which he was teaching a beginning trader.

    As I have said in each of these threads. The 'proof' has been available all along. People simply fail to go out and find it. Jack told everyone where to go find it, yet nobody went and looked.

    I have provided names of people who have posted their trades in advance. I have called trades in advance. I have now linked to a P & L - all within this thread.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #482     Mar 24, 2007
  3. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    You forgot to mention that in teaching his student he was using the IB demo account which at that time was 15 minutes delayed. He was called out on it and has never recovered from that fiasco. Hershey muttered something or other about practicing doing executions.
     
    #483     Mar 24, 2007
  4. Jack has. He just didn't demonstrate it to you.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #484     Mar 24, 2007
  5. Spyder,

    I do not disbelieve that people can trade net profitably. I am not suggesting that Jack is necessarily a losing trader. I am not saying that isolated trading calls in advance cannot make money. However, your hyperlink does not close the gap between our opposing views of Jack's performance claims. Anything I have seen thus far remains a far cry from making the 3 times the daily range with regularity, or averaging 4-7% on account equity per day. Those are the claims I am disputing, not simple profitability. (The "always in" just makes it that much less believable to me, personally. But perhaps that is my own bias.)
     
    #485     Mar 24, 2007
  6. Whoa! Is this true? Can it be corroborated? If so, such evidence would be a sweet keepsake.
     
    #486     Mar 24, 2007
  7. Forgot? I pulled the P & L from this thread. I found no mention of what you claim I 'forgot.' Perhap's you could link to where this P & L was used in the manner that you assert, so that I might also have the opportunity to 'see' the facts as you have presented them.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #487     Mar 24, 2007
  8. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    #488     Mar 24, 2007
  9. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    Its posted here on ET.
    Do the work yourself.
     
    #489     Mar 24, 2007
  10. virgin

    virgin


    Really ? :D
     
    #490     Mar 24, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.