Objections to SCT

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Joe Doaks, Mar 19, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. doli

    doli

    Is Hershey simply on the warpath against "conventional orthodoxy," "conventional wisdom," etc.?
    What is a "new paradigm?"
    Are these buzz-words anything more than marketing-speak?
     
    #271     Mar 21, 2007
  2. It's hard to say. Jack purportedly has that BE DO HAVE thing going for him. So I guess it's a wash.
     
    #272     Mar 21, 2007
  3. virgin

    virgin

    Difficult question !


    Jack = Blablabla into infinity

    Bill = trades with real $$


    right ?:eek:
     
    #273     Mar 21, 2007
  4. Are you going to hurl the same vitriol at me when I make my big move to become ETs reigning guru? I was sort of counting on you to be a lickspittle, you know. But I can probably make do without you. I already have eighteen other ET members who leap to my every command.

    Edit: That is no joke. I have it all figured out, what ET wants. I'll even invent an idiot who attacks me with legions of aliases. And maniacal posters with machine gun aliases who never accumulate over ten posts before being banned. And sycophants, oh, yes! I am going to LIKE that part.
     
    #274     Mar 21, 2007
  5. virgin

    virgin

    Who says this Jack even exists ?!
    Maybe Jack and Quakajackers are one and the same person ?

    Maybe he is made up by Baron or a lunatic to make ET more attractive...we all now that newbies are looking for a guru
     
    #275     Mar 21, 2007
  6. Yeah I mean what a crazy nut he is, although maybe we are all just a bunch of idiots circle jerking each other :D

     
    #276     Mar 21, 2007
  7. Of course not! Unless you become Jack, that is.
     
    #277     Mar 21, 2007
  8. Wake up! It's almost showtime. Time to take piss. And get ready to fade Spydertrader's braket trades. He's counting on only ONE fake move!
     
    #278     Mar 21, 2007
  9. virgin

    virgin


    Right ! :D :D :D
     
    #279     Mar 21, 2007
  10. You're an idiot :)

     
    #280     Mar 21, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.