Only if you're a girl, or pretend sufficiently well. Tell me you look like Mirren and we're on. If not, then Clive Owen would do.
These "dulldrums", as Jack so quaintly types it, remind me of Objection #12: I don't WANT to fucking sweep, or scan or whatever it is. I have only one study I need to look at periodically, and all the rest are alarmed with tripwired audibles.
$46? You're on. But we have to do it fast, I have to go back on the road next Monday. But first, we must assertain your suitability as a sickofant: Are you willing to do the work? Will you fall for me telling you to google me and read all my posts for the last umpteen years? Do you promise never to doubt me? And defend me fiercely from all cummers?
Here is your first nd last lesion. Everybody watching? Create a one minute chart for the instrument you want to lose money trading. Select candlestick form, red for down, green for up. Spread the time scale so that the whole day will fill the screen. Spread the price scale so that a one percent move either way would fill the screen. Put thick lines on for yesterday's high (green), yesterday's low (red), yesterday's close (blue), yesterday's open (grey), and today's open (black). Put a thin red line up for the LOD today and green for the HOD. Stop! Did I tell you to put up volume? No! Pay attention! Now, if price fails to make a lower low and makes a higher high, trade long. If if fails to make a higher high and makes a lower low, short. Otherwise get out or stand aside. Now send me the fucking $46.
No, they fade that to varying degrees. Buy on the next low, short on the next high. Before Jack's 1-2-3 that used to be Sperandeo's A-B-C. But of course that was different, hahahaha!