"Obama's Plan For America" -- Wayne Allen Root

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Scataphagos, Jun 22, 2010.

  1. by WAYNE ALLYN ROOT , classmate

    Barach Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is
    brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming
    the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social
    chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.

    Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of '83). As
    Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of
    Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan
    to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and
    entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they're
    alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to
    turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent
    majority that desperately needs government for survival ... and can be
    counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no
    responsibility to pay for it.

    -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with
    health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital
    and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents
    (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn't care that giving
    free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national
    debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30
    million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist
    revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a

    -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with
    health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has
    everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the
    economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors. Those
    powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC
    and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They
    will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and
    the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new
    taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama
    "spread the wealth around."

    -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's
    asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement
    addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But
    this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat
    senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters
    who are dependent on big government.

    -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million
    potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and
    bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who
    can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion
    dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical,
    education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.

    -- Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat
    contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including billions of
    dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country.
    It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying
    union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after
    giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion
    went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public
    employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and
    pensions that are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future
    generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government,
    and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.

    -- Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job
    creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers,
    redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to
    deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes
    in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes
    to starve his political opposition.

    With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast and
    rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast
    privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a
    government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as
    socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.

    Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by my
    Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and
    Piven Plan.
  2. In other words

    Harriet Johnson: I'm not used to public speaking.

    WE, THE WHITE, GODFEARING CITIZENS OF ROCK RIDGE wish to express our extreme displeasure with your choice of President. Please remove him immediately!


    That's exactly what the militant arm of the Party of the Dumb really are, "the citizens of Rock Ridge."
  3. Another whore for corporate. How do they brainwash so many of you goofballs ...television and radio?

    "Obama is no fool and he's brilliant?" What a shame the same can't be said about you. Keep pushing that Marxist/Socialist
    stuff while corporate is behind taxpayers backs busy hiring from the pool they created to funnel contracts to them and lobbying
    for their money. Where does the govtmint spend all that money anyway? Oh, corporate ...and THATS where it stays.

  4. 377OHMS


    I would have to agree that at this point the behavior of the president looks more like intentional destruction than incompetence. Could he be following some academic manifesto he encountered during his affirmative action education? Kind of a creepy thought but it can't be summarily dismissed. The man's entire makeup consists of relationships with people known to adhere to such ideas.

    I wouldn't rule it out and think it looks something like this:

    1) Print money at unsustainable rates and give it away to the welfare class until systemic devaluation occurs

    2) Break the healthcare system profoundly

    3) Place the entitlement programs on steroids until they break

    4) Attack corporate America with taxes, fees and layers upon layers of regulations and attendant bureaucracy

    5) Artificially inflate energy prices

    6) Stifle development of conventional energy sources

    7) Establish enormous energy initiatives based upon fraudulent science and demonstrably failed economics

    8) Crush the middle class with unemployment and taxation

    9) Crush the rich with dividend, capital gain and estate taxation

    10) Seize General Motors and literally give the company to the UAW

    11) Destroy the aerospace industry, space program and defense industries

    12) Impair/emasculate the intelligence services, prosecute low-level employees

    13) Humiliate the citizens of the USA by supplication to leaders in every capitol on earth except those of allies

    14) Seize all firearms

    15) Give US sovereignty away via treaty to various world entities such as Interpol, the UN and OAS allowing foreigners to detain US citizens in the United States

    16) Give aid and comfort to leftist dictactors worldwide

    17) Encourage the swift and violent destruction of Israel

    Its a bit difficult to backwards engineer this but all these little vectors point to the same place, the massive reduction of the GDP of the United States, that is, the massive reduction in our lifestyles along with the complete loss of US influence on world events. The goal seems to me to be to bring the USA down a few notches in treasure and power.

    Do we know of any manifesto that proposes these goals?

    I do. Its the communist manifesto written by Friedrich Engels in 1848.
  5. A man who promised to do so when running for office
  6. What all you idiots don't seem to realize is most of the things Obama is doing,he promised to do so when running for office and the people elected him

    116 promises kept,19 broken.He is doing what he said he was going to do

  7. 377OHMS


    "45 Communist Goals" from W. Cleon Skousens 1958 book:

    Goals 1-15:
    1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
    2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
    3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
    4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
    5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
    6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
    7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
    8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
    9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
    10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
    11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
    12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
    13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
    14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
  8. Yannis



    "Many say that the situation in Greece is a harbinger of what is coming to the United States. They are right. But first it will come to states like New York, California and Michigan that are stretched way beyond their means and deeply in debt.

    Until now, the problems in these states have been papered over by federal aid. Essentially, Washington has relieved these states (and the local governments they fund) of their constitutional obligations to balance their budgets by giving them welfare checks in the nick of time. Obama now seeks to pass $50 billion in additional welfare to the states.

    But since these federal funds are not necessarily recurring -- and the jobs and obligations they fund are -- they simply enlarge each year's deficit hole and enable the states to go more deeply into the red.

    As these deficits mount -- particularly if a newly elected Republican House and/or Senate refuse to fund them -- bondholders will get more and more nervous. Eventually, they will realize that the less solvent states are bankrupt and will refuse to buy their debt. Eyes in Sacramento, Lansing and Albany will turn helplessly to Washington to guarantee their debt, just as Athens turns to Berlin.

    Republicans, if they control either or both Houses, should stand firm and insist that these states sink or swim on their own. America's taxpayers will not take kindly to having to bail out other states -- or even their own -- to pay for years of reckless spending. Americans will swarm to the GOP and will hail its stand.

    The time is long past when a local newspaper can generate sympathy -- even from its own readers and the state's own citizens -- with a headline like "Ford to New York: Drop Dead." Now people in other states (and even in the affected state) would stand up and cheer should the Republicans take so strong a position.

    There is currently no legal procedure for a state government to go bankrupt. Congress, especially if it is Republican in 2011, should pass a mechanism that permits states to discharge in bankruptcy their collective bargaining agreements and contracts with municipal unions. Of course, this procedure would have to let school boards and local governments do likewise.

    Obama will veto this bill and a stalemate will ensue.

    On the left will stand Obama, the unions and the Democrats demanding bailouts for the states and, truly, an end to our federal system of government. Once Washington guarantees state debt and spending, there will be no more state governance, only national rule.

    On the right will stand a Republican Congress refusing to do so unless the states declare bankruptcy and cleanse themselves of the union agreements that got them into trouble in the first place. The GOP will point out that state funding is leaking as surely as the Deepwater Horizon oil well and polluting our nation's balance sheet as badly in the process.

    The money will run out. States, school boards and localities will stop sending out checks. Emergency state funding may keep schools open, prisons locked and police and fire services running, but otherwise all hell will break loose.

    Something will give in this national game of chicken. If it is the states and Obama that blink first, we will free our local governments of the grip of municipal unions, their rigid work rules and their unaffordable pensions. If the Republicans blink first, they will forfeit their right to represent the American people, having backed down from the challenge of our times.

    This Armageddon looms in 2011, presenting us with either an opportunity to reform our government in fundamental ways or to set in stone our path to an Athens-esque meltdown."
  9. jem


    briliant.... CA is going to have to go bankrupt.

    That idea is vital to the future. I am not saying abandon retired people. But retirments have to be cut back.

    If govt would stop spending and propping up assets... all prices could deflate and we could reset at more reasonable tax burdens.
  10. jem


    brilliant with two lls.
    #10     Jun 23, 2010