Obama's New Assault On Gun Owners

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Nov 16, 2011.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    $5!!!??? Hell, lets see $10 gas for a while next fall and get all the bastards tossed out of office. We need a complete house cleaning! (no pun intended)
     
    #11     Nov 17, 2011
  2. It was the primary agenda. The idea was to have a big seizure with a lot of scary looking AK's spread out on a table or in front of some mexicans and use it to force congress to impose draconian limits of semi-auto rifles, eg "assault" weapon bans, Federal background check for rifle purchases, regristration of long guns.

    A series of articles ran in the Washngotn Post over the spring about gun running to mexico and how big a problem it was and how ATF didnpt have the tools to stop it, etc, etc. It was all orchestrated with anti-gun groups and ATF, and they clearly planned to have a big seizure to cap it all off. Instead , they got a Border Patrol agent killed.
     
    #12     Nov 17, 2011
  3. pspr

    pspr

    Obama backs down.

    Under fire from gun owners concerned about draft guidelines that could limit areas for target practice on western public lands, the Interior Department today said it would make sure shooters still have access to lands long available for firearms recreation.

    "Our goal is to leave lands open to shooting," said an Interior official for the Bureau of Land Management, which is drafting guidelines to deal with the growing clash between skittish urbanites moving to western wilderness areas and America's tradition of letting gun owners shoot targets on public lands.


    http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...s-heard-interior-will-not-ban-target-practice
     
    #13     Nov 17, 2011
  4. I support banning all firearms in all America everywhere at all times

    Guns are for stupid people. Get a life
     
    #14     Nov 19, 2011
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I support idiots like you moving to a gun free country, rather than forcing your fucked up views on me.
     
    #15     Nov 19, 2011
  6. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Take guns from citizens while arming the Mexican cartels. That seems to be the policy of the Obama regime.

    Leftists hate guns to be in the hands of citizens. It makes it harder to steal.
     
    #16     Nov 19, 2011
  7. pspr

    pspr

    LOL That's funny. :D
     
    #17     Nov 19, 2011

  8. What kind of guns do you own, Luke ?

    and , be careful you don't shoot yourself. :( .
     
    #18     Nov 21, 2011
  9. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    Has anyone noticed the FACT that guns have been flying off shelves since Odamnit has been playing basketball and his other games in the white house? In addition, ammunition price is WAY up, and that's if you can find in stock what you're looking for.

    Has anyone noticed the gun t.v. shows that are now on such as Discovery Channel's "American Guns, Sons of Guns," etc.,? Guns are once again popular again in America like they should be as they are the tools that allow CITIZENS to maintain their freedom, and be free from out of control government, and anarchy.

    IF this disaster of a communist administration starts pulling shit with guns, I predict that THIS time the citizens of America won't take it as they did under slick willy clinton. Post terror attacks, financial collapse worries, and out of control government realizations by the people make 2011 FAR from 1994...

    The government KNOWS that the ARMED American people can take Washington and restore it to what our Founding Fathers meant it to be. This gun control stunt of Odumba is just another way to try to prevent Americans from saying, "I've had enough!!!!!! Patriots will be taking up arms, and restoring America to the America it is supposed to be."

    You guys who stayed awake in history class only need to look to what happened when communists wanted to take what you have, and give it to whomever... They disarmed their people first...
     
    #19     Nov 21, 2011
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum



    * In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. This doesn't include the 30 million 'Uncle Joe' starved to death in the Ukraine.


    * In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    * Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, leaving a populace unable to defend itself against the Gestapo and SS. Hundreds of thousands died as a result.


    * China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    * Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    * Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. The total dead are said to be 2-3 million


    * Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, 1-2 million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    * Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million at a bare minimum.

    * Gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results:

    Australia-wide, homicides went up 3.2 percent

    Australia-wide, assaults went up 8.6 percent

    Australia-wide, armed robberies went up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)

    In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns.

    It will never happen here? I bet the Aussies said that too.

    While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady DECREASE in armed robbery with firearms, that changed drastically upward in the first year after gun confiscation...since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

    There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

    You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

    Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

    Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late.

    The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind him of this history lesson.

    With Guns...........We Are "Citizens".
    Without Them........We Are "Subjects".

    During W.W.II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED.

    Note: Admiral Yamamoto who crafted the attack on Pearl Harbor had attended Harvard University 1919-1921 & was Naval Attaché to the U. S. 1925-28. Most of our Navy was destroyed at Pearl Harbor and our Army had been deprived of funding and was ill prepared to defend the country.

    It was reported that when asked why Japan did not follow up the Pearl Harbor attack with an invasion of the U. S. Mainland, his reply was that he had lived in the U. S. and knew that almost all households had guns.
    http://www.rense.com/general81/ligun.htm
     
    #20     Nov 21, 2011