Obama’s Energy nominee: We need carbon tax to double or triple energy cost

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JamesL, Mar 25, 2013.

  1. Max E.

    Max E.

    The only fish futurescurrents is interested in eating is his brothers chocolate starfish.
     
    #21     Mar 26, 2013
  2. So pspr. You don't see that the video is fraud? Or you don't want to admit it. Or both. Same question to PT.
     
    #22     Mar 26, 2013
  3. Another example of a fine upstanding Christian conservative.

    Do you ever have anything intelligent to say? It seems all can do is ad hominem attacks and immature insults. What are you 15?
     
    #23     Mar 26, 2013
  4. pspr

    pspr

    Funny you should bring up fraud with regard to global warming. The only fraud I see is from the scientists pushing AGW. And yourself. Honestly!

    If you have any sense at all you will concur.
     
    #24     Mar 26, 2013
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Says the guy who makes ad hominem attacks and immature insults as often as anyone here.
     
    #25     Mar 26, 2013
  6. Wow. You're pathetic. Do you have an ounce of personal integrity or have you sold it all to your party. I show you an(other) obvious case of fraud and yet you still won't admit it. Way to be open-minded and objective there. Come on, it won't kill you. Be a man and admit the vid and attendant article is a fraud.

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama...-double-or-triple-energy-cost/article/2525310

    BTW Any other AGW denier here that wants to show he still has some objectivity and integrity can also pipe up.
     
    #26     Mar 26, 2013
  7. pspr

    pspr

    LOL You are just a fool.

    All the evidence of fraud and lies from your "scientists' and all the charts we've provided for you showing what really correlates with temperature and you are still a denier of the truth.

    Only a fool would behave like you. No wonder you settled into a low tech blue collar job. Critical thinking is not your forte.
     
    #27     Mar 26, 2013
  8. So then, just to be clear, you don't think this video and article are fraudulent.
     
    #28     Mar 26, 2013
  9. pspr

    pspr

    Of course not. Editing is NOT evidence of fraud. Are you a conspiracy nut?
     
    #29     Mar 27, 2013
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    You and your arguments are fraudulent.
     
    #30     Mar 27, 2013