Obama will pick another Supreme Court justice

Discussion in 'Politics' started by .........., Mar 15, 2010.

  1. John Paul Stevens Speculates On Supreme Court Retirement: 'Within The Next Three Years,' Maybe Earlier

    John Paul Stevens, the longest serving Supreme Court justice speculated about his own retirement from the high court in an interview with Jeffrey Toobin of The New Yorker.

    "You can say I will retire within the next three years," Stevens said, adding that he would likely make up him mind about leaving the Supreme Court within a month.

    Stevens, who will turn 90 in April, has only hired one law clerk -- instead of the usual four -- for next year, leading to speculation that the justice may be eying an exit.

    "I still have my options open," Stevens told Toobin during their Mar. 8 interview. "When I decided to just hire one clerk, three of my four clerks last year said they'd work for me next year if I wanted them to."

    Stevens, a staunch liberal on the high court, also said he had confidence in President Obama to appoint a successor.

    "I have a great admiration for him, and certainly think he's capable of picking successfully, you know, doing a good job of filling vacancies," Stevens said in the interview with Toobin.

    In an interview with NPR today, Toobin gave his prediction for an eventual successor to Justice Stevens:

    "I think it's going to be Elena Kagan, the current solicitor general and the former dean of Harvard Law School. She has a reputation as a consensus builder. She is someone who brought vigorously fighting factions at Harvard together. She worked in the Clinton administration and had good relationships with Republicans in Congress at the time. She has never been a judge, which I think is a point in her favor for Obama. There are all former judges on the court now, and I think Obama wants people of more different backgrounds. So I think she's the likely choice.
  2. Ginsburg will be out within the next 3 years as well

    Thank God Obama won,If a Repub had won they would have taken over the court
  3. That would be a nightmare :eek: .
  4. Think republicans will hold that up until they think they'll get in?
  5. The Supreme court has failed the United States and has failed it's oath of office. What does it matter?

    They refused to hear a critical case central to the safety and sovereignty of the US Constitution in who can run for President of the USA.

    They failed to balance and correct the executive and legislative
    branches of the government with the judicial branch.