I still don't see them voting for Romney's stand in. Edit: but, we'll know in 2.5 years, with the exit polling.
You're right, they won't. That's what James said. That what makes them stupid - cannot or will not vote for the option that will make the issue they are ranting about better for them.
They have a lot of equal but opposite company on the other side of the aisle. Some of them post right here I'm sure.
Please provide one example to support this post of yours. One guy who is here on this forum that is 1. on the right 2. continues to vote for a candidate who openly goes against an issue that said person finds very important.
Can you imagine scateater voting for any dem presidential candidate? Sure, it will be easy to say, "he might", but lately he seems "a bit" convinced that the dems WANT TO DESTROY AMERICA AND TAKE IT FULL COMMIE!!
But he doesn't vote Democrat because they openly support positions he is against. Every single position they stand for goes against his line of thinking and what is important. If there was a Libertarian candidate or another third party candidate that best represented his values, he'd vote them. White or black. So your comparison is completely invalid. Would you like to try again with another one here?
Unfortunately black people have been told for so long, (multiple generations), that they are incapable of helping themselves so they are now conditioned to wait on a savior. Obama can't help them, even if he cared too. The inner cities are now vast waste lands of people who have been discarded except as a campaign issue. There is little hope for them. They are pawns, very expendable pawns, in the political game. Frankly, it's incomprehensible what the radical left has done to these people. The Khmer Rouge was more merciful. This is a long, slow, and torturous death for inner city blacks, mostly at their own hand. And the dem party couldn't be happier with the never ending campaign issue to be had as a result.