Now you're trolling. "Hope and change" had nothing to do with the fundamental premise of capitalism. By the way, Romney ran on "optimism and change". Optimism being so much more meaningful than "hope", you see.
IMV... 1. Odumbo is actually a Muslim Socialist 2. Odumbo is also an Islamic terrorist... yes, he really HATES America and knows he can inflict more harm on the US by enacting polices as pres than all the bombs and killings all the delusional, virgin-seeking-in-the-after-life martyr fools could ever muster. 3. His "Hope and Change" pledge was taken as "make America better (somehow?). What he REALLY meant was to change America all right... but in as bad a way as he could get away with. Unfortunately, he is succeeding.... thanks to greedy, brain-dead "couldn't give a crap about America except for my government check" parasites and politicians.
back that up. As I learn more and more about raising money and who buys up all the real estate and all the assets. I see ts all tied into to finance guys. (you want to know who buys up many of the top country club properties in america... a fund owned by Goldman... this repeats over and over as you move in the finance world... etc. ) From every 5 to 10 soros... (money tied to finance and real estate) there is probably only 1 whose money is tied to manufacturing or something not tied to finance like maybe oil... these days in america. Plus the finance guys and the oil guys seem to be combining forces to take there turns running a big spending govt which insists on stealing our liberties as they destroy the working and entreprenaurial class by taxing and regulating our means of moving up the ladder. I feel myself jumping for some of the last rungs of the ladder right now, so my kids have a future. Ricter you are working for the team pulling up the ladder... creating even more inequality.
1. Hope and Change had everything to do with closing the gap on inequality. If, as you claim, gambling is the source of the inequality gap, then Obama should have made his move to end that. But, of course, he didn't. He enabled it further. 2. Can you please show me the "Optimism and Change" banners Romney used? For some reason I don't recall seeing them. I'm being serious here.
Common sense, mate. Everyone knows that reps know how to, and do, make money far better than dems. I am not pulling up the ladder, but I admit with some regret that I'm not lowering it, either. Perhaps some day, if it seems I may live to 150, I'll get an employee-owned business started.
Some of this is undoubtedly questionable, bunk or exaggerated. But not all of it. <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/l-HqHSkYG-Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Not sure how to search an image of the banner, but I did see it and commented on it on 26 Oct 2012 here in P&R. Part of the "jem algo" thread, LOL.
Well, the internet doesn't seem to have heard of it. I guess it happened only in Ricter-world. And, no comment on the Hope and Change point, eh?
Circumstantial evidence: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hope-today/201210/contrasting-profiles-in-hope-obama-vs-romney Google is your friend. (But not quite so much when searching for images.)