Obama to unilaterally disarm the United States

Discussion in 'Politics' started by 377OHMS, Feb 14, 2012.

  1. Hate to do this to you Max, but I too agree. We only need to be able to destroy the world a few dozen times.


    c
     
    #11     Feb 15, 2012
  2. No, you don't get the point because you know nothing about this and you're pulling ignorant opinions out of your ass.

    300 is probably not enough to maintain an effective triad because nobody knows how many would be taken out by a first strike and not all of those remaining would make it to their targets. You also don't understand yields and geographical dispersion so STFU and worry about the defense of your own country.
     
    #12     Feb 15, 2012
  3. Max E.

    Max E.

    LOL, your the one who is making fun of people who support Ron Paul, and posting the Tin foil hat pics, and you are sitting around thinking we need 1500 nukes to survive......

    Really? whose the paranoid one here? You probably go to sleep with a gun under your pillow too dont you? :D

    You really think that we couldnt spread 300 nukes into enough different locations that they wouldnt be able to take them all out in one strike, and that we wouldnt have enough to launch, and obliterate the world if necessary?

    Yeah we really need 1500 nukes, almost 8 nukes for every country on earth, just to make sure we get all the bad guys, we wouldnt want to miss one.....

     
    #13     Feb 15, 2012
  4. Maxi . . . . do you understand yields and geographical dispersion ?
     
    #14     Feb 15, 2012
  5. Seriously, Max, who the fuck are you as a Canadian who's never even served in the military to tell us what our national defense needs are?

    How many of those 300 would be available after a first strike? How many of those would even make it to their targets? How many military targets alone are there in Russia and China that it would be critical for us to destroy to minimize further strikes and how spread out are they?

    You have no standing in this and no clue either so don't tell us what we need.
     
    #15     Feb 15, 2012
  6. Max E.

    Max E.

    LOL..... your such a tool

    You have spent the last few months ragging on Ron Paul, and saying that everyone who supports him is crazy, and you think that we need more than 300 nukes to protect ourself, it must be very sad living in your constant state of paranoia.....

    You got your tinfoil hat on there chief?

     
    #16     Feb 15, 2012
  7. Max E.

    Max E.

    The one thing i do understand is that Trader666 is full of shit.... :D

     
    #17     Feb 15, 2012
  8. Really? You're a Canadian with ZERO military experience or knowledge trying to tell us how many nuclear weapons we need. So if you want to see who the real tool is just look in the mirror, jackass.
    Then you know nothing because you're the one with his head up his ass.
     
    #18     Feb 15, 2012
  9. Max E.

    Max E.

    LOL, so a part of your military training was learning about U.S. nuclear secrets?? Did they give you the launch codes at boot camp?

     
    #19     Feb 15, 2012
  10. OK, since you're on a roll with talking out of your ass, what exactly is my experience?
     
    #20     Feb 15, 2012