<img scr="http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4e1879c4cadcbb30342d0000-580-346/chart.jpg"> Hmm. What's up with image embedding?
Second try... <img src="http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4e1879c4cadcbb30342d0000-580-346/chart.jpg"> Has heritage.org included the temporary census hiring in their graph? Here's another way of looking at the data: Historical Federal Workforce Tables http://www.opm.gov/feddata/HistoricalTables/TotalGovernmentSince1962.asp Perhaps scat was referring to discretionary spending when he said, "government expansion".
I dunno, based on the BLS data (which is accurate insofar as government employees goes - since they have access to the direct data) shows a rise since Obama has been in office, does it not?
Let's see, according to conservatives, the liberals control Allll Education, they control of your very children. They control allll media, except Fox, who, lately, makes one wonder. Liberals control education, media, and unions. What is left? Oh, Wall Street. That's what is left, lol. Enter....The King of Bain
False. Here in the Heartland, it is Crimson amongst these rural towns. And their graduation rates are abysmal. Graduating High School is such a big deal that these towns shut down to congratulate the ones who make it all the way through, most, do not.
Headcount alone is a, "all I have is a hammer" way of evaluating government size. Based on nothing but my own experience, I would hypothesize that headcount is up because government activity in the safety-net divisions is up. I do know that DHS has been growing. Food safety enforcement, too.