Obama the appeaser?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Ricter, Oct 19, 2010.

  1. Maybe you're a cowardly libtarded appeaser who believes in the goodwill of islamofascists. A nuclear Iran is not at all analogous and there's no guarantee they wouldn't pass on nukes to jihadists who would set them off in the United States for 72 virgins.
     
    #11     Oct 20, 2010
  2. You might want to learn more about them yourself.

    Kennedy agreed to secretly withdraw obsolete missiles in exchange for the Soviet withdrawal from Cuba which Cuba perceived as a betrayal and which was an embarrassment for Khrushchev and the Soviet Union that contributed to Khrushchev's fall from power two years later.
     
    #12     Oct 20, 2010
  3. We'll miss you around the Nov elections <del>Barry Fag</del> littledaviedumbass :(
     
    #13     Oct 20, 2010
  4. Yeah,so everytime a country is a threat to build nukes its time to invade.How many countries over the last 50 years would we have invaded under that policy ? Under that policy right now we would be at war with Iraq,Iran,Korea, Afghanistan and Syria .Great policy
     
    #14     Oct 20, 2010
  5. Khrushchev was removed due to numerous reasons. Political rivals, Russian economy, failed farm production,slowed industrial growth etc
     
    #15     Oct 20, 2010
  6. Lame red herring. You libtards are intellectually bankrupt despite your haughty pretensions.
     
    #16     Oct 21, 2010
  7. What part of "contributed to" didn't you understand? Or are you pretending the Cuban missile crisis had nothing to do with it?
     
    #17     Oct 21, 2010
  8. We are technically still at war with N. Korea. No treaty was ever signed.
     
    #18     Oct 21, 2010