So rather than guess what you are trying to say... I will ask you what is your point? Note that the Fed has been buying down interest rates.
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xFPzVp3MvFg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Jem, instead of wasting your time responding to my posts, why not spend some time reading what the economists have to say. You'll find them on both sides, but its very lopsided to one of those sides.
There is no both sides. There are no two truths. Show me one economist with data who stated that the Kennedy, Melon Reagan tax cuts were not followed by increased revenue. Your statement was preposterous... again how would cutting say 20 percent off a businesses expense not lead to a more profitable business. Some of those business will hire more laborers. Some will open up new overseas markets. WE no longer have time to accept leftist bullshit. There are no two truths on this. you are totally fucking wrong. So is your philosophy. There are times tax cuts lead to gains in productivity. we know fed revenues always goes up that is what happens with a systematically debased currency in our system. What we have to do is cap or cut spending. Tax cuts are nice way to stimulate the economy. I suggest we eliminate fed income tax and cap spending. The budget will balance eventually and economy will grow.
Here is a quote from Keynes himself. Notice the insult he directs at you in the last sentence. Nor should the argument seem strange that taxation may be so high as to defeat its object, and that, given sufficient time to gather the fruits, a reduction of taxation will run a better chance than an increase of balancing the budget. For to take the opposite view today is to resemble a manufacturer who, running at a loss, decides to raise his price, and when his declining sales increase the loss, wrapping himself in the rectitude of plain arithmetic, decides that prudence requires him to raise the price still more--and who, when at last his account is balanced with nought on both sides, is still found righteously declaring that it would have been the act of a gambler to reduce the price when you were already making a loss.
Leftist moronic thinking: Government can't make it's minimum payments without borrowing... so we need more government.
You don't understand a thing that I have written. Nor do you have even an inkling of where i stand on these matters. Pity.