The Syria thingy is contrived, the legality of bombing the place is contrived. Somebody really wants Syria screwed up royally and they are getting their way.
http://web.archive.org/web/20130130...chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html This was published on 29 Jan 2013..... Who knows what is really going on?
Let's bring our troops home. Let's produce and consumer our own energy. Let's bring our jobs home and produce our own goods with as much of our own resources as we have. The hell with the rest of the world. Let them take care of themselves with the understanding that we will fuck them up if they fuck with us. Other than that, they can blow themselves to hell for all I care.
Daily Beast: Obama Administration Refused to Send Gas Masks to Syrian Opposition, Despite Abundant Supply Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-sh...d-send-gas-masks-syrian-opposit#ixzz2dPLiJu9n So...Obongo won't send gas masks to prevent gassing deaths. But he wants to start WWIII bombing Syria AFTER the gassing deaths.
Radio Lib Claims Obama Attacking Syria ... to Lower Jobless Rate Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-c...acking-syria-lower-jobless-rate#ixzz2dPTYpEZm NOW Obongo is worried about the jobless? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Letterman on Syria: âNow Obama Can Start a War the Next President Will be Stuck Withâ Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...ar-next-president-will-be-stuck#ixzz2dPUFhs40
You should recognize one thing, The foreign policy errors I refer to go back far beyond Obama's time. They started, at least, with the U.S. acquisition of the Phillipines in the Spanish American War and got worse as time went on. We were perpetually on the wrong side in almost, not quite , every instance. We have always made our foreign policy decisions based on what was most profitable for American Businesses, and not on what was morally and ethically correct. We use our military mainly to defend corporate interests. Once in a while corporate interests and ethics are on the same side but not that often, and once in a blue moon American business just doesn't care one way or the other. The first time no thinking person had a choice with Palin a heartbeat away from the Presidency, and McCain still stuck in Vietnam mode. And also Obama was a breath of fresh air after our idiot president. I, as did millions of others thought, Obama can not possibly be worse. And to be honest Obama has not been worse than little Bush, but he has been every bit as bad in other ways. The second time, once again I had no choice. Romney is a fraud and hopelessly ambitious man. I could not stomach the thought of someone with the ethics of a business man, a venture capitalist at that, and leading the country while believing in the same failed trickle down economic policies that wrecked us. But on the other hand I had great misgivings, by Fall of 2012, about Obama, he seemed by then very dangerous to me. It was nearly a toss up. Everything worthwhile Obama tried to do, the Republicans succeeded in wrecking. On the other hand Obama not only did not oppose the patriot act but signed off on a strengthened version. He has proved to be truly evil and the opposite of what he pledged to be. But nevertheless he was winding down the senseless and un-winnable wars, was on the right side of the issue of gays in the military, and he was on the right side of social security, and had the right ideas initially when it came to the affordable care act, but the Republicans successfully ruined that. He was a very mixed bag, versus Romney with known integrity issues -- the integrity of a businessman, the last thing any thinking person would want in the White House. Both parties are hopelessly corrupt. And it can't be fixed because of our obsolescent constitution. If a non-corrupt well educated person attains the White House, a faint possibility, the military industrial complex and the establishment will annihilate him or her, and they will get zero cooperation from a corrupt congress.