Obama should not have won the Nobel Peace Prize!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by GOP_trader, Oct 9, 2009.


  1. Plenty of right wingers in the North, hypocrite.
     
    #11     Oct 9, 2009
  2. What's the difference now?

    Answer is: those who called him a failure are the failures, and source of it.

    W. must be full of Jeolousy tonight!
     
    #12     Oct 9, 2009
  3. W. must be full of Jeolousy tonight!
    ---------------

    He is not that kind of guy.
     
    #13     Oct 9, 2009
  4. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    He's the kind of guy who says it takes 50 years to judge his presidency. :p
     
    #14     Oct 9, 2009
  5. I don't know much about the prize but is it normal to give it out based on potential and not actual results?
     
    #15     Oct 9, 2009
  6. And Obambi's can be judged on aspirations, separate from his actions.

    Results are the one thing liberals know nothing about and the very thing they refuse to ever look at.

    It's like "his intention is to be a great trader." But he lost 1 million trading and still wins the best trader award for "aspiring" to be the best in a matter of two weeks! But God did he aspire to be great!
     
    #16     Oct 9, 2009
  7. TGregg

    TGregg

    Officially it is on results. From the Wiki:

    According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

    and

    Unlike the scientific and literary Nobel Prizes, usually issued in retrospect, often two or three decades after the awarded achievement, the Peace Prize has been awarded for more recent or immediate achievements

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Peace_Prize

    A brief review of winners and non winners shows that there are considerations far greater than achievements in promoting peace. Indeed, achievements in promoting peace are not required at all.
     
    #17     Oct 9, 2009
  8. Here let me make it easy for you.

    http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/

     
    #18     Oct 9, 2009
  9. Itsak Rabin also got it on potential to make peace, because it could not have been based on his past achievements which were more in the realm of making terrorism.

    Obama deserves it!
     
    #19     Oct 9, 2009
  10. slacker

    slacker

    If you look at the other awards you can see that Obama is a perfect fit:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17899-best-of-the-ig-nobel-prizes-2009.html
     
    #20     Oct 9, 2009