You are a f*cking joke........I think you are the same person as Opt777 You debate with the mind of a child. What a waste of time.
BUT it does NOT necessarily mean he doesn't know what he's talking about. I get it...you don't agree with McCartney. Shocking...
No, I didn't. You did: You chose the specific references and I simply compared them and commented on them. Thanks for making it easy.
I doubt McCartney has ever paid a penny in U.S. income taxes. He's not a citizen nor legal resident. Even if his income is derived in the States-and I imagine most of it is-he's exempt from Federal taxes, unless he stays here better than half the year, which he doesn't.
Quote from Mav88: They are pulling for their favorite politician so they'll publically say anything, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- is it me or does anyone else noticed that ..... cannot form a detailed argument at any length? I don't get it, why would a guy participate in this type of discussion if all he can retort with is 'you respond in typical republican fashion' when in fact he didn't present any facts at all, he simply asserted without a reference that Warren Buffet is personally impressed with Obama's resume.
And your dumb ass asserted that he wasn't We don't know for sure as Buffet has never commented on Obamas resume,but we do know that Buffet publicly supported Obama and said he was doing a good job.Imo that supports my opinion more then yours <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MtWdFr1bkgA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MtWdFr1bkgA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KI3eVNd6bGQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KI3eVNd6bGQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_PDLcL0H_5k&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_PDLcL0H_5k&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Sorry for being slow to respond. I see your point and I may have overreacted. But, it's hard to critique performance in a vacuum, much easier to compare two or three related cases. Because of their time proximity, here and in many other places, Obama is most often being compared to GWBush. Actually, it's Obama who insists on reminding everyone of this, as he blames his predecessor for everything. Coming back to W, I don't think that he was perfect, not even close, and I strongly disagreed with some of his policies, eg the war. But, ultimately, I found him trustworthy and a good representative of the typical American. Like him, I respect life, I think that lower taxes help everyone, not only the rich, and I don't trust (don't even like) the UN. All in all, as I mentioned before, I think that W was an average president, certainly much better than the guy we have now. I also think that Clinton was very good and Reagan was the best, especially during his first term, before he started getting sick. And, of course, I'm aware of the fact that many others disagree. Oh well.