Obama OUTRAGE... "Wounded Military Should Pay Their Own Medical Costs"...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Scataphagos, Aug 17, 2009.

  1. #11     Aug 17, 2009
  2. #12     Aug 17, 2009
  3. Really now?

    Is that why he signed into law the +8.2% increase in the MHS- United Medical Budget for FY-2010 over 2009 - - - $47.4 BILLION that goes to taking care of military personnel and their families?

    http://www.defenselink.mil/comptroller/defbudget/fy2010/fy2010_SSJ_Special_Topics.pdf


    Once again, Dr. Jerk-Off has no idea what he's talking about.
    Far be it from him to actually reference the FACTS.

    The same goes for Gnome or Scataphagos or whatever his current alias is these days.
     
    #13     Aug 17, 2009

  4. Agreed
     
    #14     Aug 17, 2009
  5. Martin Wolf of the FT, shortly after the election of 2004:

    What did he mean? Read and learn:

    This is why they can't tell the difference between satire and something a person would actually and truly have said and done.
    My eighth-grade history teacher pointed out to us the difference between revolutionaries and ordinary folks: revolutionaries have no sense of humor.
    The fact that the OP wasn't able to figure out that the quote that started this thread out was satire is very telling. It's simple: he has no sense of humor.
    The other way you can tell a radical is by looking at the exchange between Maddow and Armey: faced with a real world debate about a real world proposal, Armey resorts to talking about "what this has to do with anyone's notion of liberty". Radicals are always more interested in ideological purity than they are in practical solutions to real-world problems.
    Obama is interested in the latter, and so is still trying to figure out a compromise that would bring some Republicans on board.
    As this and all the other threads on this board on this subject show, it's hopeless. He's a practical man dealing with ideological idiots. He should simply give the Republicans and conservatives hell, and be done with it.
     
    #15     Aug 17, 2009
  6. Once again FloydLandis82 you are wrong. Read it and weep.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/03/18/obama_drops_controversial_thir.html?wprss=44
     
    #16     Aug 17, 2009
  7. gnome

    gnome

    Hey Landis82, YOU LYING PIECE OF SHIT!

    I agreed to stop referring to you as the "Nastiest, ill-tempered, head-up-your-ass, SOB, ASSHOLE I ever encountered on the internet", and you agreed to leave my name out of your posts.

    So, what's the deal? You can't live without name calling and personal attacks? You can't hold to your end of an agreement?

    No need to respond... I'll be putting you back on ignore. Just wanted to take this opportunity to reinforce your jerk-off-edness in case any ETer had any doubt.
     
    #17     Aug 17, 2009
  8. Somebody struck a nerve.

    :p
     
    #18     Aug 17, 2009
  9. You're using humour, right ?

    Obama may be a practical man, but more than likely he is a politician.

    Obama is dealing with ideological idiots ?

    Obama is a socialist ideologue, his mentors are/were socialist ideologues, and many of his appointments are socialist / marxist ideologues. I assume therefore, that your statement regarding ideological idiots would be anyone who is not a socialist / marxist.

    11 of the 24 congressional committee chairs are held by socialists.

    Pratical man dealing with idiots ! That is humorous!

    These cabals of fabian/progressive/socialist radicals in the congress have been laying dormant since Clinton, but Obama has given these radical cicada the opportunity to unleash their political pornography upon an unsuspecting public.

    You stated that Obama should just give the Republicans and conservatives "hell" and be done with it..........Let us hope that "hell" does not spill over to the nation also.
     
    #19     Aug 17, 2009
  10. Care to provide links to anyone you mention below that is a registered member of the socialist party...?

    Thanks.

     
    #20     Aug 17, 2009