Newsweek's Reed: Obama "out of his cotton-picking mind" By Bob Parks | Fri, 06/18/2010 - 08:14 The left's strategy is clear: any opposition to President Obama is not driven by ideological and/or political disagreement. No, it's driven by racism and whole groups of people have been strategically tarnished. You would think these people would be even more careful, then again the majority of people making racist statements against the president these days seems to be coming from the left.... <object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Xd2G8zIruz" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Xd2G8zIruz" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object> Whoops. While we all know what Obama supporters would be shreiking had this been said by a Republican, watch how quickly this dies down when coming from one of their own.
About 10 seconds in you'll hear the burning question on the mind of every disillusioned southern Dem that voted for Obama. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW8FKnN-H60
Gabfly, you've lectured us over and over (with zero examples) of how the right is driven by racial hate. How come then these comments keep popping up from people on the left? As the resident expert in right wing racism, please explain!? One more thing, do you support Alvin Greene?
I do believe that it is only considered racist/racism when it comes from the mouth of a Right, white male (the MAN). Everything else is fair game. Or so I am told.
DEMS TURN ON OBAMA By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN "To the left, the oil spill is not an index of presidential competence or an issue in the political sphere. It is a daily gushing of poison into the Earth's waters as a direct result of the president's failure to stop it. They blame BP. But they already hate oil companies. And they blame Obama, too. And they are coming to dislike him. When Obama attempts to recoup this damage to his political base by pushing new legislation on the environment or by resurrecting his cap and trade legislation or by bringing criminal charges against BP or by setting up a liability fund for the spill's victims, it does not solve his political problem. With each day, 60,000 gallons gush into the Gulf, Obama's equivalent of the body count in Iraq that caused the left to loathe George W. Bush. Rhetoric or programs or visits to the Gulf or posturing won't assuage the negatives. Only plugging the hole in the bottom of the ocean can do it. The right and center of American politics turned off Obama over health care. And now the left is leaving him over the oil spill. Why can't Obama plug the hole? Because he has no administrative experience. I often saw Bill Clinton, as governor and as president, call in experts and ask the tough questions when he faced a new disaster. In Arkansas, it was tornadoes or floods or fires. In Washington, it was Oklahoma City. But, each time, he thoroughly familiarized himself with all the technical issues. He took a bath in the science and substance of the hazard and became as knowledgeable as those who had spent a lifetime studying it. So he knew what questions to ask. Any CEO or COO or manager has similar experience. But a community organizer, law professor, state senator, US Senator, and president doesn't have the requisite experience. He doesn't know not to trust his own bureaucracy. He hasn't been burned enough to realize that he needs to intervene to waive restrictions, set aside regulations, and open up the process to new solutions. He's like JFK during the Bay of Pigs. He doesn't know how to avoid being betrayed by his own bureaucracy and the industry it's supposed to regulate. Why did he not waive the Jones Act (he still hasn't) to allow foreign vessels to ply our waters to clean up the spill? Not because he was against it. He couldn't have been against so obvious a course as waiving it. It was likely because nobody told him about it and he never knew to ask. Why did he let the bureaucracy use only US contractors to dredge the Gulf and build the berms that Louisiana wanted? Why did he spurn the offer of Dutch assistance (half the country has been dredged from the sea and is below sea level)? Not because he wanted the jobs to go to Americans. That would have been an insane consideration in the face of this crisis. it is probably because he never realized that our capacity for dredging needed augmentation. Because he never asked. To the right and the center, these failings show that Obama is in over his head. But to the left, which bleeds for each drop of water in the Gulf and cries over every turtle or shrimp or sea bird, it is an unpardonable sin. It is the nature of things that presidential mistakes metastasize into presidential character flaws. Bush's inaction over Katrina comes across as insensitivity. Now Obama's incompetence and inexperience is causing liberals to see him as arrogant, aloof, removed, conceited, suspicious of outside advice, and even lazy. Long after the oil has stopped spilling, these supposed character defects will haunt the president, just as Carter's reputation of timidity and inability lasted long after the Iran hostages came home. These defects will last until 2012 and beyond."
The substantive nature of your one liner posts correlate rather nicely with Obama's descending competence. Let's try it again: Gabfly, you've lectured us over and over (with zero examples) of how the right is driven by racial hate. How come then these comments keep popping up from people on the left? As the resident expert in right wing racism, please explain!? One more thing, do you support Alvin Greene?
Obtuseness becomes you. You wear it well. But shouldn't you focus your efforts on defending BP? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2874900#post2874900