Obama mulls 'indefinite detention' of terror suspects

Discussion in 'Politics' started by drjekyllus, May 14, 2009.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

  2. TGregg

    TGregg

    But boy, if Bush were reconsidering a Close Gitmo order, the howls we'd hear from the libs. For them, almost all of the issue is decided by the person making the decision.

    If Bush had changed his mind like this, the libs would have three threads near the top of the forum on this subject.

    And isn't it interesting that all the rest of the pussy nations aren't interested in taking any of the Gitmo terrorists? They are all for closing Gitmo, cheering the decision, but when it's time to host these poor, innocent, tortured, miserable souls who are good people and just need some help. . . they run away. Obviously they realize what sort of scum is under discussion and (like all liberals) are eager to demand other people take care of them.
     
    #12     May 17, 2009
  3. so whats the diff? the only diff OBAMA made is to put these guys on US SOIL close to your home. OBAMA....NICE:D
     
    #13     May 17, 2009
  4. the diff is, GITMO AINT CLOSING when Barry says it is. Mark my words.
     
    #14     May 17, 2009
  5. The silence continues.
     
    #15     May 19, 2009
  6. They'd all rather complain about Sarah Palin's 150K wardrobe, to them its far more important than a matter of national security.
     
    #16     May 19, 2009
  7. I'm Canadian and do not support Obama or the democrats, you ignorant fool. We have a Conservative government that is closer to the Republicans than Democrats...educate yourself before you're embarrassed further.
     
    #17     May 19, 2009
  8. TGregg

    TGregg

    #18     May 19, 2009
  9. Cesko

    Cesko

    He said fags but in reality he's got one specific Canadian in his mind. It wasn't meant to to be anti-Canadian post.
     
    #19     May 19, 2009
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Thumbs up!
     
    #20     May 19, 2009