Sure you wouldn't Judging by your spelling and assessment of Obama's performance, I'm thinking that maybe you want/need a socialist welfare state?
Judging by your lack of knowledge of a socialist welfare state I'm thinking you need to educate yourself on the subject before commenting on it.
You are better off putting that idiot on ignore, most of ET has him on ignore. He is a Bush worshipping neocon who will ignore everything against his position and pick on trivia to troll.
Libtards always run away with their tails between their legs when they get beaten down enough http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2900278#post2900278 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2916379#post2916379 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2916391#post2916391 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2916405#post2916405
More about how Obama has failed on jobs: <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2918332>
The economy will be fixed with an 11% flat tax. When a politician brings that to the table --- he will be more famous and more admired than Reagan.
Won't see that until after the revolution. Until then, politicos favor the progressive tax system.... and the more progressive, the better... enables greater Big Government control.
Whether Cat is recovering or not does not change the fact that they will have to find a way to cover the new 100 million dollar a year bill. Like i said before, businesses will recover regardless but it slows the recovery tremendously. Where do you think the 100 million dollars is going to come from? For every example like CAT who is still able to make money right now, there are atleast 100 small businesses who are on the verge of going under right now, who only need a small added cost to send them over the edge.