Obama is the sleaziest piece of shit to ever make it into the whitehouse.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Max E., Aug 8, 2012.

  1. Odumbo continues to pander to the idiot class.

    [​IMG]


    Obama: Voting 'Best Revenge' Against Romney

    by John Nolte 2 Nov 2012

    As is often the case when he goes off-teleprompter, at a campaign stop in Ohio today, Obama revealed a side of himself we haven’t seen since Hurricane Sandy gave him the opportunity to play The American President for a few days. The old Divider-In-Chief returned with a vengeance when in the middle of an attack on Mitt Romney he told a crowd at a campaign rally to stop booing and, " Vote! Voting's the best revenge!"

    What he obviously meant was that voting is the best revenge against Mitt Romney.

    What kind of divisive, ugly rhetoric is this coming from a sitting president? It's easy to sympathize with the fact that Obama's record gives few reasons for anyone to vote for him; and that for that reason, he's been forced to attempt to destroy his opponent with a half-billion dollars in negative ads -- but now the President of the United States is publicly telling a crowd of Americans to vote for revenge. And not just revenge, but revenge against another American.

    But what else are we to expect from apresident who spent weeks on binders, Big Bird, birth control, and bull shit -- the president whose surrogates have used the word "felon" to describe Romney and accused him of murder?

    This behavior isn't just unpresdiential, it's un-American.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/02/Obama-Voting-best-revenge-against-romney
     
    #171     Nov 2, 2012
  2. pspr

    pspr

    Well, nobody ever claimed Obama was an American. Oh, wait --
     
    #172     Nov 2, 2012
  3. Obama aide says there would be slavery if Lincoln governed today

    On Monday’s broadcast of “Morning Joe,” NBC News correspondent Chuck Todd relayed an impression from an Obama aide who said, given the state of the modern Republican Party and the gridlock in Congress, President Lincoln would not have been able to abolish slavery if tried to today.

    Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln” has apparently made a considerable impact on the Washington, D.C. establishment, having been regularly cited by political commentators since its release last month. And according to Todd, it looks to have made an impression on the White House as well.

    “You’re going to like this,” Todd said. “So, I threw the Lincoln analogy at a close aide to the president last week, and he said, ‘You know, with this Republican — with the way politics of Washington are today, there’s still be slavery. Lincoln wouldn’t have been able to navigate the polarization between the media between this…’ It was an interesting and depressing observation from this very smart White House aide.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/03/c...very-if-lincoln-governed-today/#ixzz2E1NBcawO
     
    #173     Dec 3, 2012
  4. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    #174     Dec 3, 2012
  5. jem

    jem

    Case in Point Lincoln was a Republican and it was the dems who wanted out of the U.S. Republicans were and have been the leader on Civil Rights issues.
     
    #175     Dec 3, 2012
  6. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Facts have no place in a Chuck Todd rant.
     
    #176     Dec 3, 2012
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    Hi all!

    Obama is president until 2016, and there is, as they say, "sweet fuck all" you can do about it.

    But, you could quit your:

    <img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tmM8OQUr5ZM/TWt7jTZFuiI/AAAAAAAABOI/SsdQ8hz8SVs/s1600/crybaby.png">
     
    #177     Dec 3, 2012
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Damn! He's drunk already, again.
     
    #178     Dec 3, 2012
  9. Obama is the sleaziest piece of shit to ever make it into the White House.

    Obama Stands on Graves of Children of Sandy Hook to Push Gun Control

    A new craze has swept the left in America: standing on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook to push gun control. First, it was Piers Morgan of CNN, implying that those who disagreed with him politically simply don’t care about the murder of kindergarteners.

    Now it’s President Obama.

    In one of the vilest orchestrated press rollouts in American history, President Obama trotted out the parents of a murdered child from Sandy Hook, stating:

    You know, when I visited Newtown last month I spent some private time with many of the families who’d lost their children that day. And one was the family of Grace McDonnell. Grace’s parents are here. Grace was seven years old when she was struck down, just a gorgeous, caring, joyful little girl. I’m told she loved pink. She loved the beach. She dreamed of becoming a painter.
    And so just before I left, Chris, her father, gave me one of her paintings. And I hung it in my private study just off the Oval Office. And every time I look at that painting, I think about Grace, and I think about the life that she lived and the life that lay ahead of her. And most of all, I think about how when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now, for Grace, for the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators who had so much left to give; for the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall victims to senseless violence each and every day; for all the Americans who are counting on us to keep them safe from harm.

    He didn’t justify how any of his proposed legislation would have stopped Grace’s tragic murder. That’s because Obama has no justification. He just has emotion. And he’s going to push his agenda through a combination of unearned moral superiority and cheap gimmickry.

    In fact, Obama’s entire press conference was built around the notion that logic and reason should have no place in the debate about gun control. He flanked himself with children – a pathetic attempt to hide bad policy behind the fresh faces of kids he could exploit:

    I started getting a lot of letters from kids. Four of them are here today, Grant Fritz (ph), Julia Stokes (ph), Ini Zeha (ph), and Teja Goode (ph). They’re pretty representative of some of the messages I got. These are some pretty smart letters from some pretty smart young people. Hinna (ph), a third-grader -- you can go ahead and wave Hinna (ph), that’s you. Hinna (ph) wrote, “I feel terrible for the parents who lost their children. I love my country, and I want everybody to be happy, and safe.”

    And then Grant, go ahead and wave Grant, Grant said, “I think there should be some changes. We should learn from what happened at Sandy Hook. I feel really bad.” And then Julia said -- Julia, where are you? There you go. “I’m not scared for my safety, I’m scared for others. I have four brothers and sisters, and I know I would not be able to bear the thought of losing any of them.” And these are our kids. This is what they’re thinking about.

    Well, so are we all. We all wept when we heard about Sandy Hook. We weep still. But we also want to pursue solutions that preserve the rights of Americans and actually protect children. We aren’t interested in posturing. We’re interested in effectiveness.

    President Obama is not. Instead, he takes gun control advice from children. Here’s how far we’ve fallen as a country: we mocked President Jimmy Carter in 1980 when he said that he worried about nuclear proliferation because his 13-year-old daughter, Amy, did. Now, we celebrate a president taking his legislative cues from a group of first graders.

    Perhaps the seven-year-olds can lay out their debt ceiling strategy for President Obama, too. After all, they can’t do any worse than his current team.

    But Obama wasn’t done yet. He laid out the worst possible justification for any law, the “if it can help one person” justification:

    Because while there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there’s even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.

    This is perhaps the least sensible basis for law in the history of man. Of course we have an obligation to try to save lives – while balancing that obligation with rights and responsibilities. But by Obama’s logic, we should ban cars, buckets, hammers, and donuts. After all, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.

    But this is Obama’s fearmongering: never let a good crisis go to waste. Utilizing our fears to achieve step-by-step deprivation of American rights – deprivations that make us no safer – is Obama’s plan. And he must exploit emotion to the hilt in order to achieve that plan. So he does.

    This is not adult conversation. It is childish posturing. As Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) put it, “the piling on by the political left, and their cohorts in the media, to use the massacre of little children to advance a pre-existing political agenda that would not have saved those children, disgusts me, personally.”

    But the media loves this nonsense.

    So Obama will continue to preach from atop the graves in Newtown. He, along with his media lackeys, will continue to draw a false dichotomy between caring Democrats and uncaring Republicans, even as Obama leaves children just as unprotected as before and invades the rights of 300 million Americans.

    Ben Shapiro is Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the book “Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America” (Threshold Editions, January 8, 2013).

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/16/Obama-stands-on-SH-graves
     
    #179     Jan 17, 2013
  10. [​IMG]


    A Quick Guide to the Obama Administration's Four Major Scandals

    By Bryan Preston

    As of Monday, there are *four major scandals dogging the Obama administration. More than one of them have the potential to bring major officials down and dominate the news for the foreseeable future. The stories are all moving so fast that it’s difficult to keep track of them all. Here they are, in no particular order.

    1. Health and Human Services soliciting funds from the health care industry for the implementation of ObamaCare. This one is “raising eyebrows,” says MarketWatch.

    The Times said Sebelius obtained $10 million from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and $500,000 from H&R Block for the effort. HHS officials said that Sebelius’s efforts would continue, after first denying they were soliciting funds for the effort. But a spokesman for Sebelius said a section of the Public Health Service Act allows her to encourage others to support those working to help carry out public health activities.

    Sebelius reportedly has sought donations for Enroll America, a private non-profit group that is working to get the uninsured covered under the 2010 health-care law.

    “Nice company ya go there…” This activity is illegal, and marks the second known time that Sebelius has broken the law while atop HHS. The first was when she used official time to campaign for Obama’s re-election, then reimbursed the agency after the fact to paper things over. Does Sebelius get a third strike?

    2. Benghazi. Four Americans died in a terrorist attack conducted by Libya’s al Qaeda branch, Ansar al-Sharia, on September 11, 2012. President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Ambassador Susan Rice all blamed the attack on a spontaneous demonstration against an obscure YouTube movie, and downplayed al Qaeda’s role. Just a few days prior to the attack , the Democratic National Convention pushed a theme that al Qaeda had been put on the run with the killing of Osama bin Laden. Talking points drafted after the attack were edited 12 times, consistently to remove references to terrorism and al Qaeda specifically. The YouTube movie never appears in the talking points, but it became the message of Clinton, Rice, and Obama through his UN speech on September 26, 2012.

    Security had been deteriorating in Benghazi for months leading up to the attack. A warning published in Egypt on 9-10 proved that the attacks were not about a movie at all. Information from the field during the attack proved that it was a coordinated terrorist attack. Someone ordered U.S. special forces in Tripoli who were readying to respond to the attack to stand down. The administration continues to claim that it did not have time to marshal U.S. forces to help, but they had no idea how long the attack would last. Libya deputy chief Greg Hicks, who assumed command upon the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens, testified that he believed that the attack had turned into a hostage rescue situation when Stevens went missing. The U.S. Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) is designed to go from “zero to wheels up” very quickly and should have been deployed, according to Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary of state for operations — counterterrorism bureau. The Accountability Review Board appointed by Clinton to investigate Benghazi never interviewed Clinton or Thompson, and did not have stenographers present when witnesses were interviewed. Hicks and Thompson claim that State officials engaged in intimidation to silence them. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) has spent most of the Benghazi scandal running interference for the Obama administration, but after last week’s dramatic whistleblowers’ hearing is calling for more public testimony from more witnesses. More whistleblowers are reportedly considering coming forward.

    3. The Department of Justice secretly obtained the phone records of 20 lines at or connected to the Associated Press. Media are fuming today over the “massive and unprecedented” grab of AP phone records.

    The AP reported that the Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors dated April and May 2012, including incoming and outgoing calls, and the duration of each call, for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery.

    The sweep was evidently in response to a leak about a terrorist attack, a second jihadist underwear bombing attempt. Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to explain his agency’s actions today. Some are already calling for his resignation or firing. Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey appeared on Fox News Channel today and questioned the wide sweep of reporters’ communications, including their personal cell phones. The AP says that it was not told anything about the sweep in advance, and that it still has not been explained to them.

    4. The IRS targeted conservative Tea Party groups, and Jewish groups favorable toward Israel. For about two years and through the 2012 election, the Internal Revenue Service deliberately targeted conservative, Tea Party, and anti-Obama groups, and groups with “patriot” and “constitution” in their name. The IRS demanded deep personal information of everyone involved with these groups, and was evidently building a database on them. IRS official Lois Lerner apologized for the targeting last week, and claimed that the targeting only happened in the Cincinnati office. Since then, Americans have learned that officials in Washington knew about it a year ago, and were involved. The IRS also leaked information from the groups to liberal ProPublica, according to ProPublica. President Obama claims only to have learned about it on Friday, and in the media. But Congress has asked questions off and on about it for a couple of years now. The New York Times praised the IRS for targeting conservatives in May 2012. The targeting has had a chilling effect since 2009, when Obama joked about unleashing the IRS on enemies. This scandal gets a hearing on Friday. The fact that the IRS is empowered to deal with Americans’ health care choices thanks to ObamaCare adds an additional chilling layer to this story.

    Update: IRS may have targeted pro-life groups too. And there may be a new scandal brewing at the Environmental Protection Agency.

    *Fast and Furious and the Pigford scandal are still lurking out there, but neither is in the headlines at the moment. Obama may have killed off Fast and Furious when he invoked executive privilege to seal off the White House’s communications with DOJ on the subject.

    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/05/1...own-the-obama-administration/?singlepage=true
     
    #180     May 17, 2013