And to think people actually voted for this fool. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/inJs_VB7tFs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/inJs_VB7tFs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> or this fool <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L8__aXxXPVc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L8__aXxXPVc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
the teleprompter's got it's own blog and if one reads it, there is no doubt that it is smarter than the person who is totally dependent on it to make it through press conferences.
So says the PUSSY that refrains from posting a screen-shot of his trading results for Q4 of last year during the "Obama Crash".
finally come to the understanding that it's obama's crash, eh? i guess slow people come to realize the obvious in a very slooooow way.
Not really. Everyone here knows that you are not a NEW member or poster at ET. You are obviously someone that was "banned" and has come back with yet another alias. Why not just do us all a favor and tell us what your ET name was before you came back again?