Fraud and abuse is RIFE in unemployment insurance (U99'ers), housing (minorities and white trash who don't want to work), career welfare moms, etc. Nearly 50% of the country collects some type of Government handout. It's jokes. SS and Medicaid is ponzi. The average couple will pay in something like 190K over their lifetime, but collect over 320K, if memory serves (medicaid). The system is gamed, as a matter of routine. All of these programs need to end at the Federal level, and let the States take care of it themselves. There's no Constitutional authority granted to the Feds for any of this, anyhow. Lets start with the U99'ers, then end housing assistance for crackhead moms. All these fucks not on disability can get a job. Round up the illegals, deport their asses, prosecute employers who use illegal labor, then let all the U99ers get their asses to work. That includes all the poor, downtrodden blacks that suffer the incredible misfortune of living in the United States - the easiest place in the world to earn a living. Pure fucking jokes.
If Shareholders had their way, the Rule of Law and courts would have zero authority over corporations. Governments role is to institute tax and trade policy that benefits the broader economy. Not the pathological executives who only care about their next quarterly bottom line, because that's all their idiot shareholders care about. What's good for my pocket, but bad for America, is shit and I would never support. Politicians are supposed to be the guardians of the nation, and act responsibly, but they're just as much whores as the Fortune 100 types who buy them off.
Right on. We got separation of church and state, now how can America get a separation of money and state? (Admittedly an ancient problem. : ))
Easy, dont allow government to take money from people and there will be no need to seperate money and state.
The regulations in this country are what cause unemployment. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nBiJB8YuDBQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Hey, you asked the question, i was merely answering it. The basic premise still holds true, you want to seperate money and state, then make it so that there is less money needed to run the state.... The bigger the government, the larger the bureaucracy the more susceptible it is to be influenced by money.... Eliminate most of the government, and they will no longer hold power over people, thus there is no point in bribing them.
Max is right. That's why NO regulation, and paltry tax is the answer. Corps push for more regulation because they own the regulators. They write the rules. With no regulation, there's nothing to corrupt. And there's no regulatory protection from liability, like there is now. One of the main problems, is regulatory capture. Outlaw regulation and there's nothing to capture. Grievances are settled by the courts, re private property and personal injury.