Translation: You don't have any! P.S. I went looking for the dozen times that you proved the pictures at the link given in a slightly earlier post were false. I guess the DNC must have had them removed. Mine was the first link to FactCheck's debunking of the birth certificate silliness. I am so sorry that you are so paranoid and angry and deluded and all of those little mild issues that you seem to show. I wish that I could help you. Sadly, I can't. Maybe, if you have any skills that we could use, you could emigrate to the USA, and get some help. I hope for the best, really I do. Please forgive me for forgetting that the normal rules of logic do not apply to you and your arguments. The fact that you are using "World Net Daily" as evidence should have told me everything that I needed to know. Now, it's your turn. You say: "You're stupid, wrong and a n****r-lovin' lib-tard" and politely forget to answer any of the questions that have been asked in the past about your (quite weak) theorem. Then later, you can say to the next poster who asks: "you're stupid. I answered this a bozillion times before." Man, I really, really shouldn't be doing this. If I let you have the last word, you'll believe that you won. Arguing with you is not sensible. You're a hateful, illogical person, and you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the nose. You bring out the worst in other people, which was probably your intent in the first place. I am so not proud of myself here. Now go ahead and do that voodoo that you do so well, get in your last word, believe that you've won, and go upstairs and help mommy set the table for supper. I'll be finding the "ignore" button and trying to get on with my life. I'm planning on getting my skin dyed black, having a sex change and having 300 babies so as to get rich in your imaginary new welfare state that Sen. Obama will be bringing in when he wins the election in 8 days. You have a nice life, and do be sure to get some help, jerk-hole. I'm done. Really.
That's four currently running at my count - Berg's federal suit, the state suit in Hawaii, the state suit in Washington, and now this one in Ohio. And there may be more coming. I mentioned this before, but I'll repeat that it is within a state's rights to hold back on a candidate's electoral college share if he does not satisfy their requirement to adhere to the constitutional demand of the candidate being a naturally born citizen.
I quit reading your post right here because you are such a dimwit you are not worth reading. I never claimed anything was false. The pics are of an issued version, not the original vault certificate of live birth. The issued version is an abreviated version. The whole story of Obama's birth is only on the full vault version. It is important because in Hawaii it is possible to obtain a birth certificate without having actually been born there. Now go get educated, then come back and apologize for being such an idiot...
You'd be surprised at how different the topic looks with Gordo and his three sock puppets ignored out of it. Surprised indeed.
Here's a funny one. No candidate in the history of the US has been asked to produce an "Original Vault Certificate" before these guys got their mad on that some black guy would have the nerve to get elected president (I'm jumping time by eight days). To hear them, it's called the WHITE House for a reason. Oh, they'll tell you that it's eight reasons from Sunday besides race, but this black guy is the first one that has riled them so. You do the math. 1+1 apparently equals N****R! Oh, I'm so angry. Not that it's doing any good.
Here is a letter a concerned citizen sent to factcheck.org ------------------------------------------------ To whom it may concern, Re: Obamaâs birth certificate First of all its NOT his birth certificate or even a certified copy of his birth certificate. Its an official certification of Obamaâs birth in Hawaii by the person in charge in Hawaii. Its printed on Laser paper which means its new, not from the 1960âs. It simply states that Obama was born in Hawaii according to whoever printed out the form. Its a certification, not a Certificate of Live Birth â totally different. That particular form is not even good as a form of ID if you donât have a passport on a cruiseship or are going to Mexico. The reason is that you can actually request a state to correct your BC with a AFFIDAVIT AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION and they will type all the info in that you fill out on that form, without ever even looking at your Certificate of Live Birth. So what you have on record is the amended version, and unless you actually see the Certificate of Live Birth you would never know that there was a difference or even a certificate at all. The issuer of the short form, which you are displaying, is simply printing out whatever has been typed into the computer from the certificate of correction form. My son has worked in vital statistics at this is what he told me. So in order for there to be a true confirmation of Sen. Obamaâs Citizen status, you will need an official copy of the Certificate of Live Birth.
Here is a portion of another letter written by a concerned citizen. ----------------------------------------------------- To get a birth certificate issued for a child, the parent(s) fill out an application. The parent certifies the accuracy of the information by signing a section which essentially states the information provided is accurate. (like the verification statement you sign when filling out your tax return which verifies the accuracy of the information). If a child is born in a hospital, a hospital staff person certifies the information in one section of the application and provides the staff personâs name and the hospital where birth occured. However, not all children are born in a hospital so this hospital certification is not required in order to issue the birth certificate. Therefore, it is possible that the canidateâs mother delivered her son in Kenya, possibly because most airlines wonât let you fly after a certain date in your pregnancy. After, his birth in Kenya, his mother and he arrive in Hawaii. She gets the application to apply for a birth certificate and to avoid âproblemsâ â sheâs about 18 remember, she just puts down that he was born in Honololu, Hawaii. And signs the document. Sheâs not a lawyer, probably canât afford to consult with an immigration lawyer if she thought about it and she is likely not an expert on Immigration and Citizenship laws. All she wants is a birth certificate for her son and sheâs a U.S. Citizen right? Whatâs the harm. None really until her son decides to enter politics and run for president of the United States which requires that all canidates be ânatural bornâ citizens of the U.S. i.e. born in the U.S. or conferred that status under the Immigration and Citizenship laws at the time of birth. Naturalized citizen is one who applies for citizenship as an immigrant or if child born abroad and seeks to assert childâs right to dual citizenship (where parents of child are of different citizenships). The Constitution does not allow one who holds the status of ânaturalizedâ citizen to qualify to run or act as president of our country. So, what is needed is either an original (Vault) birth certificate showing the hospital, or the application which shows the hospital staff person and hospital where he was born in Hawaii, or the actual hospital records. Otherwise, all we are relying upon is an eighteen year old girlâs assertion of where her son was born. Given the alleged statements by his paternal grandmother circulating around the web that the grandmother was at his birth in Kenya, the question is a legitimate one given the constitutional requirement that one be a born in U.S. to run and act as president of the U.S. If he was born in Kenya, then the Immigration/Citizenship statutes govern whether she can confer ânatural bornâ citizenship status. According to the lawsuit filed by a former Deputy Attorney General for Penn., the applicable statute in 1961 stated that for a U.S. citizen to give this status to their child born abroad at least one parent must have resided in U.S. for 10 years before the childâs birth AND the parent had to reside in U.S. for 5 of those years after age 14. His mother was 18 when he was born, not 19, so she wasnât eligible to confer ânatural bornâ status to her son Barack if he was indeed born abroad. I am curious why his maternal grandparents havenât spoken up to clarify the issue as one would think they would know where their daughter was while she was pregnant and where she was when she gave birthâ¦.unless they were not in contact with their 18 year old daughter during this time period.
Yes - the issued version proves nothing. All that matters is on the vault version that Obama does not want anyone to see. I wonder why?