Obama and the Minister

Discussion in 'Politics' started by rubibond007, Mar 14, 2008.

  1. Gord

    Gord

    I already answered your naive belief that Democrats offer peace and bliss. Carter and Clinton were wreckless idiots who share almost all of the blame for the development of worldwide Islamic terrorism. Obama's pacifism would only provoke the enemy to take advantage of his misplaced faith. Why do you think the terrorists are rooting for the Democrats to win?!? Why do you think that OBL's talking points mirror Democrat talking points?!? They see Democrats as suckers. And they are right.
     
    #111     Mar 21, 2008
  2. You should try to remember what it was like on Jan 20th 2001

    No war,good economy,budget surplus,gas 1.18 a gallon,strong dollar


    Bush leaving office=The Iraq war,biggest run up in national debt of any presidency,The US dollar turned to shit,The economy wreaked,gas will be over 4.00 a gallon
     
    #112     Mar 21, 2008
  3. Saddam had the balls to invade Kuwait under Bush 41,not Clinton


    Bin Laden had the balls to launch the biggest attack On the US in US history under Bush 43,not Clinton



    Your arguments are spin,mine are facts
     
    #113     Mar 21, 2008
  4. Gord

    Gord

    You think that nothing Clinton did or failed to do carried over into Bush's term's? How simplistic a view you have. No wonder you think that pacifism will lead to peace with terrorists and despots. [​IMG]
     
    #114     Mar 21, 2008
  5. Gord

    Gord

    And there weren't any terrorist attacks under Clinton? When do you think they built up the courage to attack US soil? You are such a simpleton. [​IMG]
     
    #115     Mar 21, 2008
  6. The Iraq war,biggest run up in national debt of any presidency,The US dollar turned to shit,The economy wreaked,gas will be over 4.00 a gallon............so all this is Clinton's fault right ?
     
    #116     Mar 21, 2008
  7. Compare the lives lost and monetary cost of the attacks under Clinton to the monetary cost and lives loss under the attacks under Bush
     
    #117     Mar 21, 2008
  8. Gord

    Gord

    The Iraq war can be laid at Clinton's feet as much as Bush's. Democrats are the big spenders, but I admit Bush spends too much as well. Not sure what Bush could do about the dollar. The economy is hardly "wreaked". Already explained gas prices.

    I see that our discussion has slowly swirved away from our original tract - that McCain would bring us into WWIII. I have answered all of your objections and do not wish to rehash them.

    I'll ask you one more time: Why do you think the terrorists are rooting for the Democrat party to prevail in policy and the elections? Why do you think OBL mirrors Democrat talking points?
     
    #118     Mar 21, 2008
  9. Gord

    Gord

    You are fooling no one but yourself. Only a partisan idiot would cling to the thought that nothing one president does or fails to do will affect the following president's reign.
     
    #119     Mar 21, 2008
  10. 1.I do not wish to get in an economic debate,so I'll just say many would disagree with your opinion on the economy

    2.Obama=Opposed the Iraq war from the beginning,will end the Iraq war

    McCain=will continue the Iraq war,has repeatedly made hostile threats or remarks regarding Iran,Korea,China and Russia

    3.I could care less with what Bin Laden wants.Clinton bombed areas where he thought Bin Laden was.Bush started full scale wars trying to catch Bin Laden.both failed but Bush caused much more damage and loss of life,even starting a war with a country that had nothing to do with Bin Laden
     
    #120     Mar 21, 2008