Between Bush 41,Clinton, and Bush 43,who has had this country in the biggest,most costly,and deadliest military conflicts ? Clinton had the US involved in small military conflicts.Bush has the US in a the middle of a full scale civil war that he started.McCain will have the US in a even bigger War,possibly the biggest ever McCain has promised to stay in Iraq,Made serious threats to Iran and Korea,said he would defend Taiwan if China attacked them,and has made hostile statements in regards to Russia as well McCain is a traumatized nutcase who can't wait to bring this country to war Countries like China and Russia have been building up their military because of people like Bush and McCain I hope its the children of people like you that have to fight in the McCain wars that he will start
Russia backed the Serbs and if they had gotten involved you would have had your WWIII. There was no American interest in Serbia whatsoever. Nothing. Clinton was wreckless and didn't even bother consulting the UN, much less getting their approval (which if we believe liberals since, is almost like consulting God). No. Saddam Husein started that war. And there is no civil war. (Give your Democrat talking points a rest, will ya?) Thank God for strong leaders. We certainly do not need a pacifist leader like Obama in a world with enemies. You honestly believe that they wouldn't build their militaries if it weren't for Bush and McCain?!? You are delusional. Bill Clinton gave China the technology that brought them an estimated thirty years ahead in their ballistic missile program and now allows them to reach N.A. with their nukes. Thanks Bill! This was to either pay the Chinese off for their money laundering to his presidential campaigns, or he was being blackmailed by them for his "intern" problems. We'll probably never know which. Well I sure hope we don't have to count on people like you if we do have to fight.
Let's not just pick on poor ole' Bill. After all he just wanted to be president and have some fun - too bad his fun was so detrimental for the country. Another genius of a Democrat president was Jimma Cahtah. His brilliant diplomacy brought us what developed into worldwide Islamic terrorism. Thank you Jimma! (Some might argue that this is WWIII.)
How many American lives were loss on Clinton's watch ? How much money was spent by Clinton ? How many lives were loss on Bush's watch ? 9-11=over 3,000 the Iraq war almost 4,000. how many solders have loss arms and legs and been severely wounded = over 20,000 How much money has been spent by Bush? The Iraq war=over a trillion when its done,more then that if McCain is elected money given to companies like Dick Chaney's halliburten with their no bid contracts=billions How much was gas when Clinton was in office ? 0.90 -1.20 a gal.How much is gas under Oil man Bush ?
Oh great! Another opportunity to repost an old favorite. I posted this first in a thread alleging that Bush was the worst president in a generation: --- As far as Bush being "THE WORST President of our generation", did you forget about president Clinton? He started his presidency with an expanding economy and left it in a disaster. First there was the stock market bust. And don't forget about the Enron, Tyco, Worldcom, Global Crossing, etc. fiascoes. Those led to a recession (remember it was president Clinton that declared that the business cycle was over - LOL). Then there was the "Wall" which he erected between the FBI, the NSA and the CIA so they could not share information and dig into his Chinese money-laundering, and which led to the security intel failure of 9/11. Oh, and don't forget about allowing Laural Space to hand the Chinese antiballistic missile technology that brought them 30 years ahead, and now they have nukes that can reach N.A. (was that a payoff for the laundered money they contributed to his campaigns or was it from being blackmailed over Monica or other "interns"?). And then after much posturing in 1998 about Saddam's WMD's president Clinton instead left his mess for president Bush to solve: Transcript President Clinton explains Iraq strike - December 16, 1998 http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stor...ts/clinton.html "The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world." "The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government - a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people." "If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people." "And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them." President Clinton should have invaded Iraq in 1998 when Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out, and they knew he still had stockpiles of WMD's. But we all know that Clinton was just a poser - everything he said and did was with an eye on the polls (and the Monika problem). President Clinton also let North Korea continue to develop its nuclear weapons program without repercussions even though he supposedly "negotiated" an agreement with the N. Koreans to not make nukes. The political correctness of the Clinton administration had CIA operatives sewing "diversity quilts" supposedly to make them more sensitive to the countries they were supposed to spy on. That and similar nonsense allowed Libya to develop a nuclear weapons program even more sophisticated and mature than today's Iran program. (Thank goodness Bush invaded Iraq, which directly led to Libya voluntarily giving up its nuke program so it would not be the next country invaded by Bush - that alone makes the Iraq war worthwhile.) President Clinton will always be known as the "blue dress" joke-of-a-president who couldn't keep his pants up, or his enemies down. And you think Bush is "THE WORST President of our generation"?!? Give your head a shake... --- As far gas prices are concerned, who is it who won't let us develop our own domestic oil exploration and production so as to not be so dependent on foreign oil? Hint: This party has led the congressional poll approval numbers to the lowest in history.
1.I don't agree with Clinton's military actions,but it is not nearly as bad as Bush's Iraq war 2.I must have missed it when Saddam attacked The US 3.I would rather a cautious leader rather then a aggressive one 4.Not to the extent that they are currently building them. 5.If the US suffers an attack like Pearl Harbor,i would gladly fight and die for this country. If McCain escalates the Iraq war,attacks Iran,Korea etc.you are right,you cant depend on me to fight his wars
Nice how you dodged that I was answering your accusation that it is Bush who threatens us with WWIII. I am not surprised. He on many occasions attacked UN mandated air force fly overs. And where do you think that anthrax came from? The UN, including all of our major allies authorized resolution 1441 which authorized war for non-compliance. Saddam didn't comply. I would rather have a leader who knows when to be cautious and when to be aggressive. Well this is true - the Chinese couldn't build nuke missiles that could reach N.A. until good ole' Bill provided them with the technology to do it. Who do think, given the chance, it will be that nukes "Pearl Harbor" or NYC?
Its funny when you people like to blame Clinton for Bush's fuck ups Bottom line is Clinton left office with this country in good shape.No wars,budget surplus,good economy,gas at 1.18 a gallon How is the country with Bush leaving office ? For the record ,i am not a Clinton supporter.i voted for Paul . I am not a fan of Hilary or Obama.but it has come down to Obama or McCain. I would rather a few billion given to blacks and the poor and no war rather then trillions spent on war and possibly World War III or Nuclear War under McCain
You better go reread my post. Bill Clinton left the country in a mess. Most of the problems during the Bush presidency can be directly attributed to Bill Clinton's "I'm here to have fun" policy.