It makes an assumption that loss in GDP is temporary rather than permanent. Key word, "assumption". It's not math, it's fudged math. But I love it. I'm going to think about the "potential" aspects of all data I quote from now on. I'll see where that gets me.
More projection? And actually it's over 100, but don't let the facts get in your way now. You never have before.
Who would you think would be the more intelligent and responsible person, the corporate jet pilot or the roofing contractor? That's right, the 95 points you mention are actually the difference in IQ between the roofer and pilot. And, not in a good way for you! LOL