Their claims can be independently verified, I am aware of Newsweek's troubles and avoid citing them but the article is solid and made no factual errors regarding the dossier claims.
by the way I just looked at your politifact garbage. wow are they over the top feeding delusions to you trolls. Somehow you and politifact are trying to argue that a subsidiary of Rosatom has no connection to another subsidiary of Rosatom. As if common ownership of Russia Uranium companies is not a connection. Are you nuts? Definition of Subsidiary - A company controlled by a holding company. Definition of Russian Uranium Subsidiary Company... controlled by Rosatom and therefore Putin. are you that desperate to lie for the Clintons and the Obamas...
Says the leftist jackass who incessantly accuses others of pedophilia as if accusations are fact unless disproved. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7226121/?q=pedophile&o=date&c[node]=27&c[user][0]=327981 https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7226137/?q=pedo&o=date&c[user][0]=327981 https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7226166/?q=pedophilia&o=date&c[user][0]=327981
Right wing pervert and Roy Moore supporter still searching for sick stuff on the internet, is that how you landed up on the forum?
When have I ever looked at a 10 year old girl and find her sexually attractive enough to say that I will be dating her? Or walk into underage girls dressing rooms to see them naked?
To find a girl sexually attractive at that young age is the pedo problem, I didn't say he raped this one too. Let's have a poll and ask others if looking at a 10 year old girl and finding her sexually attractive is pedophilia or not if you are still unconvinced. And what's your explanation for walking into girls dressing rooms to see underage girls naked? That's not pedophilia either now?
Utter nonsense. Thinking a girl will GROW UP TO BE sexually attractive when she matures and finding "a girl sexually attractive at that young age" are two different things entirely. Again you default to "pedo" accusations. Why is that? What's your stand on Bill Clinton and Epstein's Lolita Express? "Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com." http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/1...ders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html
He wasn't speculating that the girl will grow up to be sexually attractive, he already found her attractive and then waiting for her to become an adult so he could 'date' her. It fits the definition of pedophilia. And you still refuse to address Trump's trying to see underage girls naked Correlation is not causation, Trump flew on Lolita express, dined with Epstein, wanted to be character witness at his pedo trial. Those don't prove Trump is a pedophile, I am relying on actual evidence of his own actions, testimonies and his own words.