NYSE vs. Nasdq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by vox_lucidus, May 21, 2004.

  1. Not to mention....why in the WORLD would you want to work
    for someone else when you have the trading skills to beat
    the the #1 Quant firm in the world?!?!? LMAOOOOOOOOO :p

    Geeezuzz.... with even a little bit of capital, you would turn it
    into MILLIONS in no time.

    But of course.... you rather go slave 80 hours a week for some stupid firm? :confused:

    Dude..... this guys stories grow taller and taller every post.
    Next thing, he will be telling us he is Paul Bunyon and has
    a blue ox. LMAOOOOOO :p

    [​IMG]

    :D


    Gee.... while I have been toying with this trader pup wanabee,
    my robots just keep collecting $$$ today.... hehehehe....
    Aaaahhh full auto trading is sooooo nice.

    peace

    axeman


     
    #231     May 28, 2004
  2. well axe,
    well, there sure as hell is SOME reason soooo many talented traders trade with firms and not themselves! isnt there??? otherwise we wouldnt have all of these great traders at all of these firms would we!??? but we DO! EVEN peter panholzer and DE SHAW ppl work for WHAT!!??? oh thats right ! FIRMS!!!!!why dont you go get your computer to tell you what that answer might be!?
    and btw, average trader employed by firm wks for 40-50 hrs a week...so say the statistics



     
    #232     May 28, 2004
  3. first of all, most prestegious buy side houses are rather small! usually less than 20 ppl or so, you moron! even if i were at a sellside firm which are bigger, my identity would still not be safe, if you already know im in fx, fx is usually avery tight community, shows me how much you know about the industry, you idiot....
    and furthermore yes some equities prop house DO offer a salary as I have just recently been offered one.....yes they are probably the more prestigious of the equities prop houses that are more diff to get into, but none the less, that is one of the reasons i have been looking for an equities firm that pays salary and dosent req cap contribution, it tells me what kind of firm they are....as i am not experienced in equities, i will be limited to such a position, but
    a firm that pays a salary
    1) has a vested interest in your success, unlike a chop shop gimme 5k and when its gone so are you, type of firm......
    2)the fact that there is no cap contribution implies that there is no conflict of interest, i want to make money and they want to me to make money,
    this kind of firm is the only kind of firm i have any interest in wking for, churn and burn shops just arent for me......
    just like in FX, i have held both sellside and buyside positions, having decided that the buyside is where i want to be, i want to gain exposure to diff types of instruments and diff markets, as a good buyside trader knows all diff markets.....just as i had to learn fx, i will have to learn equities....
     
    #233     May 28, 2004
  4. LMAOOOOOOOOOo you dumb ass! These people STARTED
    trading companies! For example Peter Panholzer is
    PRESIDENT of Panholzer Advisory Corporation.
    And David Shaw is the CEO and FOUNDER of D.E. Shaw.
    They didnt go to work for some lame PROP FIRM for a pathetic salary. :D

    OMG you're dense... LMAOOOOOOOO :p

    Dude.... you are doing the right thing... you BETTER keep looking
    for a salaried job, because you obviously CANT trade for a living :D

    These guys are TRADERS so they started TRADING.
    Your looking for a crap salary job...LOL :p

    If you can beat all these guys, why havent you started
    a TRADING company like them and started TRADING?!?!? ROFLMAOOO :p



    peace

    axeman


     
    #234     May 28, 2004
  5. no you are the dumbass, peter panholzer is actually the president of dynex corp, and both peter and david traded with other firms before starting their own!!!! and THEY BOTH EMPLOY OTHER TRADERS THAT MAY GO ON ONE DAY TO START THEIR OWN FIRMS!!!!! just like george soros, traded at QUITE A FEW FIRMS before founding soros fund mgt....see a patern here??? maybe your computer will!!!!!so YES for the record ALL of them DID GO TO WORK AT FIRMS FOR SALARIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CHECK YOUR FACTS BEFORE RUNNING YOUR MOUTH......youll look alot less stupid that way....the worlds most successful traders are traders with lots of institutional experience, not idiot who sit in their studio apt and try to tell their comp how to trade, and all of a sudden say, 'HEY i know what ILL START AN ASSET MGT CORP!!!!!!!'

     
    #235     May 28, 2004
  6. So Peter Panholzer was never president of Panholzer Advisory Corporation??!?!?!?
    ROFLMAOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
    Dude... check your facts.... and get off the crack ok? Really.


    Yes... I see a pattern here. Your a complete MORON :D

    These guys TRADE.... and you dont. End of story.

    You're an idiot blowing smoke looking for a lame job at
    a prop firm instead of trading for a living.

    Keep digging yourself deeper. You cant even get basic facts straight :p

    And stop trying to compare yourself to Shaw, Panholzer and Soros ok?
    Its incredibly embarrassing and egotistical. You can only have
    wet dreams of being anything like them.

    Notice all the bullshit you have posted about beating the #1 quant
    firm and yet have NEVER provided a shred of evidence that its true :D

    All bullshit lil boy..... back to the cookies and milk for you.
    What a moron. :D

    peace

    axeman




     
    #236     May 28, 2004
  7. Oh and for the record, from the Dynex website:

    Peter Panholzer is NOT the president of Dynex.
    Marlene HARRISON-PANHOLZER is :D

    Peter is the CIO.



    Geeezzzus your an idiot :D

    Can you get ANYTHING right? Guess not :D

    peace

    axeman


     
    #237     May 28, 2004
  8. no,
    if your brain will allow you to recall,
    we were talking about what peter panholzer is the president of NOW! and i dont care at all weather or not you believe that i have beaten de shaw, if you knew WHAT DE SHAW HAD DONE, which you DONT, youd know that beating de shaw is no big feat, at least IMO, now your ignorance has been exposed and your trying to refute the mere fact that im a trader LOL!
    smells as much of desperation as ALL of your posts!
    on the contrary all of MY fact are entirley str8, it is you that cannot determine the time frame we are referencing(past or present)

     
    #238     May 28, 2004
  9. LOL...what a dumbass.... lets review shall we?

    AXE: Peter is president of Panholzer Advisory Corporation.
    VOX:no you are the dumbass, peter panholzer is actually the president of dynex corp

    BBZZZZTTTT.... WRONG: Already posted the data from the Dynex site. He is NOT president of Dynex.
    Further, this doesnt change the fact that Peter was president of Panholzer Advisory Corporation.

    Wow.... with an intellect like that...WHY HASNT a top firm
    hired you already? LMAOOOOOOO :p

    And yes yes.... you beat Shaw and and everyone...riiiighhhtt...

    Sorry... but in case you didnt notice:
    "i dont care at all weather or not you believe that i have beaten de shaw"

    Does not magically relieve you from the burden of proof MORON :p
    Oh...and what about the weather? Is it gonna rain or something? ROFLMAOOO :p


    Geeezuuz....are you trying to surpass longshot as ETs stupidest
    person or what??? :p

    peace

    axeman


     
    #239     May 28, 2004
  10. Wow, such hostility, such anger!! Love it! :D
    So the FX community is really small huh, very interesting, since the FX market is the biggest market in the world.

    Wow, so you have incredibly impressive credentials. Where did you learn to become such a whale of a trader? Obviously not from any formal education, so you just got an opportunity somewhere in some back room, made it to the trade room, and next thing every prestigious firm wants you? Funny shit asshole!! :D :D :D
     
    #240     May 28, 2004