Really great traders dont go looking for salaried positions. They TRADE to make a living The punk is looking for a salaried prop firm position...lmaoooo What a hoot Then again.... if you can get 100 to 1 forex leverage and you STILL dont have enough capital to trade for a living, then maybe you BETTER look for a salaried position! LMAOOOOO peace axeman
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO..... the dumbest person on ET arrives to support this idiot. Birds of a feather and all. Hey longshot.... I put a few 100G bets on the table to back up your shit talking and all you did is RUN LIKE A SCARED LITTLE GIRL! Recognize the comp sci skills and put down the 100Gs I challenged you with dumbass My software smokes wealth lab and I have 100Gs on the table. Im ready to take your money shit talker BACK IT UP!! http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=33206 OR SHUT IT UP! peace axeman
i think that their position has been sifficiently exposed....lets just see if they return to reveal their insecurity and stupidity any further...... btw, has the thought ever occured to you that somone may WANT to wk for a firm??? so that they can make a BETTER living and be exposed to MORE brilliant traders(not computers), i WANT to wk for a firm i dont HAVE to, i really dont HAVE to work at all..... notice that all of the great traders do all the trading themselves, not try to tell computers how to do it........im very well acquainted with that world, as i pointed out earlier in my thread, and im quite familiar with its redundant nature and the meager proffits it yeilds.....i outperform shaw and i doubt you outperform them.....if you do then kudos....you shouldget a job there...but that is the most sophisticated quant house in the world, so I think its a good independant point of reference....
Your delusions run deep. Multiple posters have caught you in numerous lies and logical errors. You must be truly humiliated Making claims that you can beat someones system when you have NO IDEA what the system performance is, is well, simply idiotic to dizzying levels of egoism. Spelling "sifficiently " is just icing on the cake. Apparently, he can't use a spell checker either peace axeman
Another mind reader I see Gee... I wonder whos ALIAS this could be? I have a robot I seriously doubt you can beat. Post your trading stats and we'll compare. Put up or shut up time. As usual peace axeman
no one has caught me in a single lie, thats because I HAVENT TOLD ANY......you desperation is revealed in trying to reduce discussion to semantics such as grammar
your gonna lose whatever pittance you really have if ya keep talkin like that skippy so's ya better shut yer yap right now while your behind ;p
do you think this guys is an alias of mine??sorry try again!!! with that sort of brilliant reaoning i bet your little robots are just ON FIRE!!! hes simnply a guy who noticed the thread and wanted to comment..........