More vapid deflections. Why don't you address nunes? The topic at hand ? Or did I forget to cross a t and dot an i ?
Nunes hasn't made any claims ? the more you talk the more irrelevant you become. Nunes has made many claims. All implicate obama directly. What now pieZoe? Will soros come save the day ?
its funny... I posted that this would have been your response a few posts ago but you had to acknowledge the NSA does intercept communications. and then I deleted it. you have become a cliche. I said first you will go for the old stand by conspiracy and then freddie will post his tin foil hat gif. how much do you get paid to be a non sequitor... a thinking drone? By the way... I find Oliver Stone to be one of the few real liberals left. I don't even think he is on you team anymore. You all have joined the pre commie lefties... Stone is a traditional freedom loving liberal. I don't agree with everything he says... but lately I frequently do agree. He has done what he can to warn you drones about the power of the deep state. He can't help it if you all are deaf.
#important! RE: Crowdstrike That's the democrat shill cybersecurity firm that the DNC used when they refused to let the DNC see their servers, and who subsequently came up with all the phony Russia BS. They're having to 'walk back' a major part of their analysis because it's been outed as phony. They originaly had 'medium confidence' Russia hacked the DNC, but the part they are being forced to walk back is the part that they used to claim it upgraded their analysis to 'high confidence' of the Russia hack. Independent investigators revealed that that bit of information was a figment of Crowdstrike's imagination. http://www.voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-rewrites-part-disputed-russian-hacking-report/3781411.html See how this works? FBI couldn't see the servers, democrat shill firm did. Made up bullshit to blame the Russians, and now that it's being exposed as bullshit, nobody pays attention because the narrative is set. We assume that the FBI was excluded for this reason. But how can we not be sure that the FBI was not in on the scam? Maybe they wanted the phony Russia crap and they didn't want their name on it.
You know. This is all horseshit. The FBI can't look at the DNC servers? Since when are the DNC the Vatican? This is really bad. Starting to lose patience with Trump here. He's playing the long game, but too long. Get rid of Comey and get serious. Look how serious the other team is .
More evidence emerges that Trump was correct. This Obama goons are so blue-pilled, they viewed Trump as an enemy of the state. Actually, he was merely an enemy of their plans to get rich off government service, but to them it is the same thing. SMOKING GUN? Obama Defense Deputy Slips Up On Live TV – Reveals Spying On Trump Team And Leaking Of Intel zeropointnow Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:10am EST 13 Comments 3469 Former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas, made some stunning admissions during an interview with MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski. While discussing the mad scramble by the Obama administration to collect and preserve intelligence on alleged Russian election hacking before Obama left office, it appears that Farkas accidentally implicated the Obama White House in the surveillance of Trump’s campaign staff: The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would not longer have access to that intelligence. Furthermore, Farkas effectively corroborated a New York Times article from early March which cited “Former American officials” as their anonymous source regarding efforts to leak this surveillance on the Trump team to Democrats across Washington DC. I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew they were trying to also get information to the hill. That’s why you have the leaking. In other words; the Obama administration was concerned about spoliation of evidence gathered through various “sources and methods” of surveillance, so a plan was hatched to leak this information to congress – also known as “The Hill.” ... Possible conspiracy to frame Russia for the DNC server breach? On a related note, Evelyn Farkas is also a senior fellow at the vehemently anti-Russia Atlantic Council, along with Crowdstrike founder Dimitri Alperovitch. The Atlantic Council is funded by the US State Department, NATO, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukranian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk. CrowdStrike, the Irvine, CA company partially funded by Google, was the only entity allowed to analyze the DNC servers in relation to claims of election hacking: Notably, CrowdStrike has recently been discredited – and was forced to retract evidence used in a botched report on Russia hacking Ukranian military equipment. To sum up: The White House surveilled the Trump campaign and then leaked information to anti-Trump allies in congress (on “The Hill”). The Russian hacking claim hinges on a CrowdStrike Report from Dimitri Alperovitch. Alperovitch was forced to retract statements in a report blaming Russia for hacking Ukrainian military equipment – a failed attempt to smear Putin. Alperovitch, along with White House Leaker Evelyn Farkas and Ukrainian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk, are all senior fellows on the Atlantic Council – which is vehemently anti-Russia. (As an aside – Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, sits on the board of a Ukrainian gas company reportedly owned by Pinchuk) Is it a stretch to suggest that the CrowdStrike report on the DNC hack was fabricated to pin the DNC hack on Russia? Let’s not forget that Dr. Steve Pieczenik – former CIA spookmaster and expert on all things cloak and dagger, completely laid out what’s going on: “We initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange, who’s been very brave and really quite formidable in his ability to come forth and provide all the necessary emails that we gave to him to undermine Hillary and Bill Clinton.” In other words, ‘white hats’ within US intelligence agencies passed the emails to Julian Assange in order to wrestle control of the USA out of the hands of the Clinton cabal of Neocon globalists. It’s also quite likely that Seth Rich, the mysteriously murdered DNC computer expert, assisted this effort. Recall that Wikileaks, while they would not confirm Rich as a source, offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killer(s) – and then raised it to $130,000. Simply read between the lines during this Julian Assange interview. http://ibankcoin.com/zeropointnow/2...ls-spying-on-trump-team-and-leaking-of-intel/
Trump's business network reached alleged Russian mobsters http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/29/trumps-business-network-reached-alleged-russian-mobsters.html
Too much shit comes from both sides. It soon will be difficult to tell truth from fiction. Use your nest judgment and common sense.