NSA Snooping - Hands Off Mosques

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Jun 13, 2013.

  1. pspr


    Do we need an more proof that Obama is against America and for the murderous Muslims?

    The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won't snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

    That's right, the government's sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

    Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

    Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

    We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel's formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

    Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.

    If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped.

    The bureau didn't even contact mosque leaders for help in identifying their images after those images were captured on closed-circuit TV cameras and cellphones.

    One of the Muslim bombers made extremist outbursts during worship, yet because the mosque wasn't monitored, red flags didn't go off inside the FBI about his increasing radicalization before the attacks.

    <b>This is particularly disturbing in light of recent independent surveys of American mosques, which reveal some 80% of them preach violent jihad or distribute violent literature to worshippers.</b>

    What other five-alarm jihadists are counterterrorism officials missing right now, thanks to restrictions on monitoring the one area they should be monitoring?

  2. LEAPup


    And this is another reason why this tyrannical government has to be replaced from the top down. Obama is nothing more than a terrorist. :mad:
  3. pspr


    At least a terrorist enabler. Obama is a bad, bad, bad guy.
  4. Typical deadly blend of government incompetence mixed with political correctness.

    I can understand why the muslims would be upset with the FBI recruiting young men and convincing them to be faux terrorists, then arresting them. I beleive the majority of the "attacks" they have prevented that we know about were not real terrorists. They were terrorists who had been set up by the FBI. Maybe some of them would have gone on to do bad things on thei rown, but maybe not.

    That however doesn't mean there should be no surveillance inside mosques. That makes about as much sense as not giving young muslim males extra scrutiny at airport security. Oops, we don't that either. But by golly, TSA has a 100% record of preventing elderly grannies from smuggling assault weapons onto planes, so good for them.
  5. The Russians handed us the Boston bombers on a silver platter, and we somehow muffed that one too. No need for invading the privacy of Americans. Just keep an eye on someone who was obviously a threat. But nooo, they ignored a real threat while running aorund doing who knows what.
  6. jem


    We will be very lucky if there is not another very serious attack. I would bet their PC orders are part of the reason they did not watch the boston terror bombers properly. It was not incompetence is was betrayal by govt.
  7. pspr


    Didn't Lucrum recently post an article from a terror analyst with an accurate track record who said a multiple strike terrorist attack was just around the corner for the U.S.?
  8. LEAPup


    No, he's a terrorist, nothing more, nothing less. He DESPISES America, and wants to destroy her, then rebuild her in the image of what his COMMUNIST Mother, and VERY Communist Daddy wanted.
  9. LEAPup


    And there you go. Common sense post. What's wrong is this government WANTS this kind of shit so they can destroy OUR liberties under the "disguise" of terrorism. They're pretty smart, sadly. I've never claimed Onazi's admin to be stupid. Hitler wasn't stupid either... The stupid people are the ones who are ALLOWED to vote all the while they get "free" goodies from tyrants, and can't realize they're being used to DESTROY a once FREE Country.:mad: :mad: :mad: