Parallel universe? No valid studies support the gun argument. Many invalid studies do, some of which were intentionally fabricated. And that is your victory? Rejoice.
So you can't defend your position. Got it. No valid studies support your position. Also, who in the hell uses a word like "daft"? No one talks like that.
Freddie is the Burger King of ET. He wants it his way, and he wants it right away. He's never been willing to put forth the effort on any subject. Just calls out how stupid everyone is for not seeing things like he does. A few half-assed links with no follow through, and we're all blind and in need of a shrink because we can't see what is so plainly obvious to him.
If the study is quarter-assed like you claim, it should be easy for you to dismantle it. One wonders why you tuck tail and run when challenged to.
You have already shown that you care. Repeatedly and in multiple threads with endless and mind-numbing posts. However, you have yet to show that you understand you are on the side of an unsubstantiated argument propped up by falsified research. If it were not for the false claims and bogus statistics, you would have...nothing. So by all means, please continue to try and finesse a losing argument while I watch.
No, you misunderstand me (again). I don't give a rats ass whether you think it's overkill or not. That's what I meant when I said I don't care. In terms of arguing my point of the debate, I very much care. That's why I put forth the effort to address specific points mentioned in your articles you spam across the forum with none of your own input (other than Lott is stinky!). And for future reference, if you claim something is bogus and manufactured, etc., it sure does help a lot when you show, specifically and pointedly, what about it is bogus. Not just copying and pasting a link from a google search. Of course, it helps to know your subject matter. You don't know shit about gun control or guns outside what you've gobbled up from the moonbat media