NRA Hijinks

Discussion in 'Politics' started by dbphoenix, Aug 27, 2014.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    #471     Oct 23, 2014
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    The headline here is absurd and misleading. The lawsuit from the police state that they have the right to use necessary force to protect themselves. Nowhere in the legal brief is there a claim that they have "a constitutional right to use excessive force".

    Here is today's hint - based on the merits of the case they will prevail in this suit.
     
    #472     Oct 23, 2014
  3. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds.
     
    #473     Oct 23, 2014
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Dishonesty AND fear mongering from douche bag garland?
     
    #474     Oct 23, 2014
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    But "necessary force" is subjective.

    If we allow it, the determination of "necessary force" will become subjective. And before you know it, ANY force the ruling powers use and which you oppose will get you thrown in jail or worse.

    (Thanks go to Scat for the use of his boilerplate.)
     
    #475     Oct 23, 2014
  6. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Like chokeholds. And gunning down unarmed civilians.

    Stuff like that.
     
    #476     Oct 23, 2014
  7. fhl

    fhl

    DANG, I like those guys!

    [​IMG]
     
    #477     Oct 23, 2014
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I'm sure Canada's latest terrorist victim feels better knowing that.
     
    #478     Oct 23, 2014
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    You're missing his point. Whatever that may be.
     
    #479     Oct 23, 2014
  10. fhl

    fhl

    [​IMG]
     
    #480     Oct 25, 2014