Except when the white guy gets dead, as in examples that have been shown to you. But just ignore those and keep to your one-track narrative while the rest of us giggle at your intellectual deficit.
Well, I'm asking you to assume the facts I posed. You don't have any trouble making the opposite assumption without any backup, ie that the cop just decided to randomly gun down some unarmed black kid preparing to go to college. It's easy to be a monday morning quaterback with 20-20 hindsight. Put yourself in the cop's position. You've been injured in a fight with two guys and the one who weighs 300 pounds is charging you for all he's worth. What exactly would you do? Show him your ACLU membership card?
I'm not making any assumptions. There's no evidence. And why am I in a fight with two guys in the first place, one of whom is bigger than I am?
Ole'! Dodging is such sport... Because you are a police officer, and attempting to stop a perp. I can see it now, the dbphoenix law enforcement officer..."Found the suspect, but sorry dispatch, no can do. He's bigger than me."
A perp of what? Jaywalking? Stick to the facts and you won't look like such a fool. "Found the suspect, but sorry dispatch, no can do. He's bigger than me, so I'll just gun him down."
Evidence Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion.Wikipedia So, broadly construed, I'd say there's no question that there is evidence.
Although in a court of law, evidence would not be "broadly construed". But I'm content to let the grand jury decide. To discuss it now is just forum fodder.