whats the problem? i demonstrated to him that i would use the justice system to handle our disagreement.
Because you operate on the fringe that's what you think is correct. I suspect 90% of the country would have been okay with a public execution.
would you want to live in a country where public executions were carried out on people without a trial?
Let the facts come out in a military tribunal. Further, I didn't ask you. You are so skewed it isn't worth conversing with you.
I disagree with your assumption that the u.s. parades itself around as the only fair way to justice. Just take a look at how the middle east conducts their trials. They still stone people for goodness sakes. Where do you draw the line? Does every enemy combatant get a trial in the u.s.? A tad ridiculous don't you think?
No shit of course. Let the UCMJ work is magic already. I predict he'll be the first Military execution since Pvt Eddie Slovak.
You turtled up like a pantywaist and threatened to use the justice system to go after him should HE decide to handle your disagreement in the SAME manner in which YOU decided to initiate IT, with physical force. YOU lost your MORAL high ground and acted like a coward. Your argument would be logical if it was HE who used the threat of the justice system against YOU. You're just a typical liberal hypo.