I do not recall that. In the 1985 version or whenever, I thought the Ruskies just dropped out of planes. I'll have to watch it again. But in the meanwhile, I am going to eat a cheese danish at you. Think about that. I am not eating a danish for you, or with you in mind...I am eating it AT you! HAHA! Attacking you with food consumption! What does that mean? I have no idea! But I am hangry I think! Have at you!
Okay, your post did not show who or what post you were replying to, and I have some people on ignore so I may have lost the context along the way.
I think the biggest factor in The US not being invaded is location,its a logistical nightmare getting hundreds of thousands or millions of troops to The US from across the ocean.Hitler wanted to invade The US but gave up on the idea because of how hard it would be to get hundreds of thousands of troops here.The US has border protection The Russians can only dream of.
In a mere single year the store closes... Whole Foods in San Francisco closing one year after opening due to safety concerns Whole Foods said the store is closing 'only for the time being' due to drug use and crime near the location https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/...year-after-opening-due-safety-concerns-report
Kind of unusual in some ways. Most stores in these shit-holes were up and running earlier in time and then just got caught in the general decline of the city. But what was Whole Foods thinking when they opened the store just a year ago? All the signs of the inevitable were there a year ago. You could have asked any local business person or resident how it would go. Not very smart.
Walmart closing 4 Chicago stores, blaming millions in annual losses "The simplest explanation is that collectively our Chicago stores have not been profitable since we opened the first one nearly 17 years ago -- these stores lose tens of millions of dollars a year, and their annual losses nearly doubled in just the last five years," Walmart said in a statement.
Lots of spoiled entitled thugs in frisco. They think they are owed something. We dont owe them crap !
No. Scalia wrote that able bodied and trained citizens are organized they able to defend against tyranny. The tyranny argument is valid within the militia context. Not the individual ownership of a gun. Obviously an individual is not able to withstand tyranny of a nation on their own. Additionally, a tyrannical government would be without the consent of the people and therefore, not a legal government and not the American government. As stands under American law, the individual right to bear arms is interpreted to extend in defense of life and property. Which is fine too but as Scalia wrote can obviously be limited.