So, you're saying Gabfly would be like Pol Pot if he were a leader? Uhm, I've read the guys posts. Definitely an arch-liberal who likes to point out buffoonery and enjoys throwing out the occasional sharp insult but I haven't seen one word about shooting people etc. Dot-Boy, otoh, is a simple Obamatron/Bush-hater and likely believes the crap he is posting. There is your potential Pol Pot.
That's not the correct question, besides you ignored my caveat about assuming anything less extreme as being acceptable. The correct question is , would gadfly stand with the libertarians against a dot boy regime? Sadly I do believe gadfly would feel all too comfortable as long as he had a thin veil of deniability. The ultra important point is to not get overly focused on the personalities on the board but know that those tendencies of intolerance to dissent are ubiquitous for leftist scumbags and the dangers (esp economically) they pose are real.
Calling Obama "nappy headed"(A racist slur) and saying 2 of our Presidents should be shot in the head is someone who has problems.As much as I hated Bush I never wished death or any harm to the man
Really ? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...er__george_w_bush_not_so_much_say_schola.html Barack Obama is among best presidents ever - George W. Bush not so much, say scholars in Siena poll George W. Bush was no FDR, but Barack Obama could be. That's the verdict of 238 of the nation's leading presidential scholars, who - for a fifth time - rated Franklin Delano Roosevelt the best president ever in the latest Siena College Research Institute poll. In office for barely two years, Obama entered the survey in the 15th position - two spots behind Bill Clinton and three spots ahead of Ronald Reagan. Obama got high marks for intelligence, ability to communicate and imagination, but his score was dragged down by his relative lack of experience and family background. "Most of the presidents came from elite backgrounds, and he certainly did not," said professor Douglas Lonnstrom, who crunched the numbers. "He grew up without a father." By contrast, Bush's dad was our 41st president, George H.W. Bush, who came in 22nd in the poll. And yet, the scholars rated Dubya a dud as a president, ranking him in the bottom five at 39th place. That's a steep drop from 23rd place, which is where Bush ranked when he entered the survey after his first year in office. Bush got docked for saddling Obama with two bloody wars and a recession, and he got low marks for "ability to compromise, foreign policy accomplishments and intelligence," according to the survey. Only Warren G. Harding, who was 41st on the list, scored lower in the intelligence category. FDR has topped each of the five presidential scholar surveys conducted by the Albany-area college since 1982. His distant cousin, Theodore Roosevelt, came in second in the survey, followed by Abraham Lincoln, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Lincoln's sorry successor, Andrew Johnson, was rated the worst president. The scholars ranked the presidents on personal attributes such as integrity, intelligence, leadership and willingness to take risks as well as things they have little control over, like luck. Washington was rated our luckiest president, followed by Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan. Watergate-scarred Richard Nixon was ranked 30th overall, but finished dead last for integrity. Lincoln topped that category, followed by Washington and his successor, John Adams. Jimmy Carter also ranked high for integrity, coming in seventh in that category. But overall, the scholars ranked two spots behind Nixon. Jefferson, who was No. 5 on the list, was deemed our smartest president ever.
Lets revisit what I really said shall we. A good case could be made for arresting each of these men based on their misuse of the powers and trust of their office. Since these Presidents ( lincoln and fdr )were defacto dictators I don't think impeachment was realistic. Dictators are only removed through Coup d'état or death (as was the case for both abe & fdr) . IOW get over it dot boy or is it period boy
One of those Presidents saved the country and the other saved the world One of those Presidents was elected twice and the other was elected 4 times,yet you call them dictators who deserved to be shot in the head You're a fucking idiot racist who needs to be shot in the head
That just goes to show what a marvelous job of white washing the truth gets you from a propaganda machine 70+ yrs and still going strong . Look at what the Germans believed in less than 15yrs of propaganda. Nobody can honestly say they embrace both of these men and their actions and simultaneously claim adherence to the founding fathers and the Constitution.
You've made your point , and since I disagree with your opinion , according to you I deserve to be shot in the head. Typical leftist, nanny welfare state, govt power is the answer to all our problems: solution for having a difference of opinion to big brothers.
Interesting. There is another Obambatron running around here with the handle lickbushnuts. Whenever his arguments went badly he would generally devolve into the same language. You've got nothing. Logic, reason and persuasion all seem to elude the leftist liberal devotees when it comes down to making any kind of cogent argument. When the failed logic falls away what is left is raw hatred. Personally I hold a rather extreme view and that is I believe that this country is going to have to confront the nuts like you at some point. I think the cultural war is trying to morph into some kind of civil war. Folks like you "just need killing" as they say in Texas.