Yes, I feel the same way. He is simple minded, not worth the effort to debate. His parents probably spend all day in various lines trying to get free handouts, ie.. welfare, foodstamps, unemployment, housing credits...etc. Period boy's surrogate parents are Rachael Meadows and Kieth Oberman.
Maybe if your dumbass talked to your so called Mexican family you would know many illegals fear dealing with with authorities due to coming here illegally and simply cross back over the same way they came in...You dumb motherfucker Since I talk to many Mexicans I happen to know that fact
Obama is at 47 and 45 % on Fox and Rasmussen today,even the right wing pollsters cant get Obama to drop to Reagans and Bushs low approval ratings
Not many illegals want to deal with customs or any US law enforcement agency.It really shouldn't have been to difficult to figure that out Criminals want to avoid contact with law enforcement, criminal justice 101 (common sense 101 as well)
A couple of anecdotes doesn't make it a fact. And again, I'll point out to you that I have an agricultural background, and as such have much more experience with these issues than you. I'm pretty positive that I have more years of experience with these issues than you have been alive. And again, your ludicrous position is that if there were land mines on the border, and this is a well known fact, that illegals would go back to Mexico by trying to get through them, rather than just driving their car across the border, all just because they don't want to be harassed by authorities. Of course, this makes the supposition that harassment would take place. You of course have zero life experience to justify this, but instead must rely on other people's stories to back your position. That alone proves just how shallow your thinking is. Typical for a lefty....
The fact that you and your dumbass buddies seem to have no problems with putting landmines on the border proves how fucking stupid your thinking is.Typical for a righty ....
You have no concept of deterrance, do you? Why do secure places sometimes use electrified fences? Is it to kill criminals when they climb over their fence, or to deter them from doing so in the first place? A rational person would say deterrance. What will you say?
Odumba will go down as one of, if not "THE" worst president of all time. This clown has spent more tax payer dollars in one year than George W. Bush has spent in eight. Odumba's doom for 2012 is coming soon, and that is not extending the Bush tax cuts, so starting in Jan. 2011, "EVERY" federal tax bracket will go up, not just the top two. Odumba will then have to explain how he's violating the single, biggest campaign pledge of his presidency by saying, "if you make less than 200k, your taxes will not be raised by one dime". This douche bag has one term written all over him. The GOP will be back in complete control after the 2012 elections. In 2012, the Democrats have to defend 23 Senate seats, while the GOP only has to defend 10. The House and Presidency will go GOP. Then the majority of America will be able to sleep better at night knowing the commie dictator is gone, and his top Nazi's Pelosi and Reid will also be history. Better days are on the horizon, and America will soon get it's country back.
Deterrence needs to fit the crime.A landmine is a death penalty for those who get caught.Last I heard in this country the death penalty is for murderers and child rapist,not people who illegally cross the border
1.Historians are already rating Obama one of the greatest presidents ever 2.Obama said he would let the Bush tax cuts expire prior to being elected,and the people still voted him into office 3.Dems will hold both houses in 2010 and 2012 4.Obama will be reelected in 2012