Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Provide the SURVEYS besides Doran that show a 97% concensus - otherwise you are just talking nonsense.

How nice - you posted more links to the website funded by Al Gore. You know - Al Gore the guy whose hedge fund is making him rich off the global warming scare.

 

They are in there. Sorry but you may have to read and listen and watch to get the essential truth that 97% of all climatologists agree. I know that will hurt your fucked up brain.

 

What happened to the...uh..."debate"?

fc has gone full retard again.

 

75/3146= .o24

2.4%

 

John Cook is the guy paid by Al Gore to run the skeptical science website. He is the biggest nutter there is besides Hansen..

lie your ass off on you want fc...97% of 33% is the absolute best skeptical science could do.

and he can not even reproduce those numbers after they were challenged by the peer reviewed paper I cited in the original post on this thread.

[/B][/QUOTE]

 

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

 

This overwhelming consensus among climate experts is confirmed by an independent study that surveys all climate scientists who have publicly signed declarations supporting or rejecting the consensus. They find between 97% to 98% of climate experts support the consensus (Anderegg 2010).

 

Reading abstracts of scientific papers and magically conjuring what the author's position is on global warming is NOT A SURVEY.

Here is the Anderegg 2010 abstract - it is NOT about 'publicly signed declarations - but about publications.

"Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data..."

 

anderegg took 1200 papers to start but in the end created their 97% number based less than 80 agw authors.

so again its 97% of agw nutters who support agw.

 

Yes, nutters. Like Exxon.

You're such an asshole.

Rising greenhouse-gas emissions pose significant risks to society and ecosystems. Since most of these emissions are energy-related, any integrated approach to meeting the world’s growing energy needs over the coming decades must incorporate strategies to address the risk of climate change.

http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/environment/climate-change