The chart is wrong? You are delusional. You can read the entire paper and retrieve all of source data used in Beck's paper which defines the chart. http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/
that and the fact the whole thing is absurd. not a shred of science showing man made co2 causes significant warming.
Exactly... FC loves big scary charts with the x and y axis' adjusted for maximum fear generation - got to love these alarmists.
Wrong. The Medieval Warm Period was significantly warmer than it is today. They were FARMING in Greenland from 900AD to 1250AD including crops such as barley. Why do you think the Vikings called it "Greenland" instead of some name like "barren desolate icy island"?
Yes, Republicans are so incredibly stupid that they don't understand that raising greenhouse gasses by 40% will result in warming.
Why does it stop at 1960? I'll tell you why. Because it's just more denialist bullshit. This is the real deal.
There is a massive amount showing it. You are just too stupid and crazed to see it. American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."
You realize the source of the data is from AGW supporters. This article simply referred to Beck's paper that graphed it and provide details / links to the dataset. So in your mind, graphing data that comes from global warming supporters is considered "denialist bullshit". Not even Mayor Ford in Toronto could smoke enough crack to make that fantasy turn into a reality.