Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Sep 16, 2013.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Is there a particular time of day that your meds wear off and you go full retard. Before posting on the Internet you may want to have the nurse at the institution bring you your pills.
     
    #561     Nov 7, 2013
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    So let's see, we need to destroy the environment...to protect it?







    (CNSNews.com) – A wind farm in the Montezuma Hills region of Northern California is seeking a permit to legally kill up to five golden eagles over the next five years even though the raptors are currently protected under federal law and an international migratory bird treaty.

    Noting that “the project contributes to California’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard goals,” the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) has recommended a five-year permit with additional mitigation and monitoring efforts, including the purchase of “conservation credits in an approved mitigation bank.”
    - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/bar...it-kill-protected-golden#sthash.KiZShlzw.dpuf
     
    #562     Nov 8, 2013
  3. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Uh...no. Why would I say that?
    There are members here more knowledgeable than I on this subject. And more credible than you on any subject. That have repeatedly shot down this absurd assertion of yours.

    You're a radical illogical irrational closed minded leftist loon.
    LOL Seriously?

    Reading comprehension, it's not just for conservatives.
     
    #563     Nov 8, 2013
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    #564     Nov 8, 2013
  5. stu

    stu

    Not ignorance, basic science spelt out for you.
    Without greenhouse gases the Earth would be frozen.
    Greenhouse gases reflect some radiation (heat from the sun) from the lower atmosphere back to Earth.
    They reflect some radiation (heat from the sun ) from the upper atmosphere back to outer space and so there is a natural balance.
    The only thing they are doing from the effects humans have on them, is to warm the planet.

    Without science you wouldn't even understand that much, not that I expect you do.

    In the upper atmosphere they do. That you have to pose such a question shows how ignorantly you approach the subject. Which is pretty much how you've approached most stuff on this board.

    The science is what makes it screamingly obvious, except to deniers such as yourself, that more co2 greenhouse gas sitting in the lower atmosphere is making the same atmosphere co2 denser , and therefore allows even less radiation to escape than otherwise would be the case , making the Earth even warmer, changing the climate.

    Because YOUR argument? You mean a conspiracist /denier / extremist / political argument.

    Why the f*k do you imagine it's not a good idea to keep polluting? Because polluting the atmosphere by pouring billions of tons of co2 greenhouse gas into it is sooner or later going to tip the balance and warm the planet and change the climate.

    The most basic science confirms it.. whereas you are merely in the usual brainless bullshit denial of it , like you always are.
     
    #565     Nov 8, 2013
  6. fhl

    fhl


    When the most basic science produces models that go 180 degrees opposite of empirical evidence, maybe you should rethink that basic science.

    But no. Not when there are $22 billion reasons per year not to.
     
    #566     Nov 8, 2013
  7. +1 Well said.

    jerm is intellectually dishonest to support a pathologically extreme and obstinate ideology.

    He has no interest in the actual truth.

    I don't think he himself believes his bullshit.

    He is trying to re-live those wonderful days when he was a public defender for murderers. He's the kind of guy who would be proud to get OJ exonerated.
     
    #567     Nov 8, 2013
  8. What the hell are you talking about? Do YOU even know?
     
    #568     Nov 8, 2013


  9. OK. I see the problem...................... You are an idiot.

    It IS absolutely true that every science organization in the world is in basic agreement about AGW. In addition there is none that dispute it.

    In addition, there is 97% consensus among climate scientists. If you don't accept facts you are simply an idiot.

    But we knew that about you already.

    In addition, Exxon, BP and The Weather Channel agree.

    What part of this do you NOT understand?

    Is up.. down? Black.. white?
     
    #569     Nov 8, 2013
  10. The Antarctic IS melting. We've been through this already multiple times. It's sea ice from the melting land ice.

    You don't need to try to be stupid. It comes naturally.

    I could show charts but it's pointless.

    You're an idiot.
     
    #570     Nov 8, 2013