I call this study / experiment/ observation... excellent science. Leftists drones must call it a lie. And tell the person who quotes it to die. FC is the proof liberalism is a disease. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ âCarbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,â explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABERâs principal investigator. âWhen the upper atmosphere (or âthermosphereâ) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.â Thatâs what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earthâs magnetic field. (On the âRichter Scale of Solar Flares,â X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe. âThe thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,â says Russell. âIt began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.â For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space. [/B][/QUOTE]
"The White House reported to House Republicans that there are 18 federal agencies engaged in global warming activities in 2013, funding a wide range of programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. Global warming spending is estimated to cost $22.2 billion this year, and $21.4 billion next year." Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/28/g...payer-money-as-border-security/#ixzz2jnsvXF2S 22 billion dollars will buy you a lot of global warming malarkey. Imagine how many scientists would be out of a job if not for 22 billion dollars being thrown down the rat hole at them.
[/B][/QUOTE] Doesn't matter. You are a lying deceptive scumbag. Fuck you. 97% of all climate scientists.......all the world's science organizations. Exxon. BP. The Weather Channel. Not one science organization rejects the consensus opinion. You are a total asshole. Fuck you. LOL
It's amazing. Jem thinks he is smarter than 97% of all the world's experts in the field, and Exxon and BP and every science org in the world. What an asshole. Only a crazed right wing fanatic would think that way.
Think about this... every thinking person knows that the greenhouse moderates temperatures. every scientists knows the earth has cycled between glacial periods and warm periods. almost every scientists knows that as ocean get warmer they release co2. all the nutters speculate that co2 forms a feed back system with clouds causing warming... (this is what the IPCC agw nutter models were/are built on.) yet none of the agw nutters seem to also speculate... that at some point in the cycle we could have so much co2 and so many clouds reflecting the suns light we could start a cooling cycle. If they are smart enough to think systematically... they should be smart enough to speculate co2 might really work like a thermostat. a little of it creates a warming feedback... a lot of it a cooling feedback. you can call it the jem co2 dynamic feedback theory.
the op in this thread just disabused you of that lie... its only .3 of scientists who say man made co2 caused most of the warming the last 50 years.
BTW Jem, you right wing nut job. Just come right out and say that you disagree with all the science orgs in the world and 97% of it's climate scientist and Exxon and BP and The Weather Channel and NASA and NOAA etc. I need a good laugh.