Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Sep 16, 2013.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I rarely if ever watch FOX news or any other news channel (CNN, MSNBC, etc.) that consists of talking pundits with little brain power.

    I review the scientific facts and think for myself.

    Maybe you should consider doing the same.
     
    #331     Oct 30, 2013
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #332     Oct 30, 2013
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #333     Oct 30, 2013
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    That's just three persons, and we already know not 100% of scientists are in agreement. We've recorded pauses before, and then they ended. Prudence is in order.
     
    #334     Oct 30, 2013
  5. jem

    jem

    we agree..... finally.

     
    #335     Oct 30, 2013
  6. What the fuck are you talking about? Your posts are a never ending string of bullshit. There is so much of it it's hard to know where to start. But let's start at your first statement..

    "I would need some science showing the net warming or cooling of greenhouse gases... It may be difficult to show because the system is complex. "

    Of course they know that greenhouse gasses show a net warming! That's why they are CALLED greenhouse gasses.

    You're fucking ridiculous.

    The rest of your post is equally ridiculous. You are assuming that the scientists are as clueless as you are. That's not the case.

    Only a lawyer could lie as well as you do and be able to be so intellectually dishonest.


     
    #336     Oct 30, 2013
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    LOL

    :D

    THIS is your "argument"?
     
    #337     Oct 30, 2013
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Yes, Prudence is in order. As in the Prudence project, the EU funded global warming modelling effort, ending in 2004 whose data results demonstrated that man-made global warming does not exist (despite hyping the 2003 summer heat wave).

    http://prudence.dmi.dk/
     
    #338     Oct 30, 2013
  9. Well, that chart at least shows how the right deals in disinformation about AGW. Those facts that you think you are getting are really propaganda put out by the fossil fuel powers that be. But you are so stupid that you think it is equivalent to real science.

    So far you posted a bullshit survey, a bullshit chart and an article co authored by a fraud. Three strikes you're out.

    You have shown no ability at all to really examine facts.
     
    #339     Oct 30, 2013
  10. jem

    jem

    you really are a moron who does not understand science.


    1. Have you heard of water vapor or clouds?
    are they a much bigger component of the greenhouse than co2?

    2. What happens when you add more clouds during the day? Do we get warming or cooling?

    Now do you understand what an idiot you are?
    Science does not even know if adding more water vapor (clouds) causes a net cooling or warming?

    Do you even understand how stupid your statement below is?

    No wonder you did not understand what NASA meant when it said CO2 is a natural thermostat.

    You do not even think the greenhouse can keep the earth cooler too. You are a leftist drone moron.





     
    #340     Oct 30, 2013