Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Sep 16, 2013.

  1. What part of "your chart only includes a very particular subset of temp readings...those of mid altitude. mid-latitude, from balloons" do you not understand. Those readings do NOT represent the earth as whole. I will stop calling you stupid when you stop ignoring this simple fact.

    The chart I posted certainly does include all the relevant models. See all the different lines? They are all the models. The chart is certainly correct.

    But you're right. I should stop calling you stupid. Idiotic is more like it.
     
    #281     Oct 28, 2013
  2. No shit Sherlock.


    But it does give proof of the properties of CO2. Whether it's in a jar or the atmosphere, those properties are still there.
     
    #282     Oct 28, 2013
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Where is your chart with ALL 73 IPCC models?
     
    #283     Oct 28, 2013
  4. jem

    jem

    you mean the thermostat like properties nasa speaks of...
    correct?


    http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

    Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”

     
    #284     Oct 28, 2013
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    The Obama administration never has been serious about curbing illegal immigration, and this story demonstrates that point. Rather than spend the taxpayer’s money on something required by the Constitution, the Obama administration is dumping billions of dollars into the junk-science of Global Warming.

    from DC:

    New estimates show the federal government will spend nearly twice as much fighting global warming this year than on U.S. border security.

    The White House reported to House Republicans that there are 18 federal agencies engaged in global warming activities in 2013, funding a wide range of programs, including scientific research, international climate assistance, incentivizing renewable energy technology and subsidies to renewable energy producers. Global warming spending is estimated to cost $22.2 billion this year, and $21.4 billion next year.

    At the same time, the federal government will spend nearly $12 billion on customs and border enforcement this year.
     
    #285     Oct 28, 2013
  6. Amazing. You still pretend to not know what a thermostat is. You still pretend to think the thermosphere is relevant.

    You are intellectually dishonest. That's worse than being stupid.
     
    #286     Oct 28, 2013

  7. Only an ignorant deluded righty would refer to the science of AGW as "junk " science or think border security is more important than catastrophic worldwide climate change and the acidification of the planets oceans, destruction of ecosystems and associated human casualties.


    Hey, we have keep out the Mexicans before we try to save the world....... is what they say.
     
    #287     Oct 28, 2013
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    So you're saying there is one positive thing about AGW, fewer Mexican illegal immigrants?
     
    #288     Oct 28, 2013
  9. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I think you are off your rocker...

    A strong military defense and proper border security is the first and primary purpose of the federal government under the constitution.

    Blowing money to solve a problem like "global warming" that does not exist is height of deluded intellect.

    I'm just waiting for 2040 where we can hear you chant the mantra of how "global cooling" is going to kill all of us. At which point we will gleefully recycle your "global warming" posts from 30 years prior.
     
    #289     Oct 28, 2013
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #290     Oct 28, 2013