Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

you are lying about what your chart shows.
if co2 lead temps...

then why do we have 17 years and 3 months of now warming on earth while co2 has gone up dramatically (see the light graph behind the lack of temp trend below.)


and don't give us the b.s. about ocean temps going up.
you have no science showing co2 causes ocean temps to go up.
as ocean temps go up... they release co2.

 

as a so called greenhouse gas... nasa says it is the most efficient coolant in the atmosphere. Note... this is science.nasa.gov...
where the real science gets gone...

you quote the whores from climate.nasa.gov


http://science.nasa.gov/science-new...12/22mar_saber/


“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.

 

jem, you bore me.

But since you still seem very confused on how the greenhouse effect works and you don't understand words.

 

Oh, and it's 97% not .3%




The Geological Society of America

"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)

 

Is it just me or is that getting a little old?

 

I have the sense that the "97% retarded parrot" will magically appear every time FC pulls this refuted nonsense out of his rear end and posts it.

 

"Because they looked into the other reasons and they could not explain it by them." WTF is that supposed to mean? So they looked into every other possibility in existence and were unable to explain it? What a load of horseshit. You sound like my 5 year old trying to argue a failed point by just filling up a sentence with a bunch of words.

Holy weak-ass excuses, batman!

 

Nor can FC explain why the Earth was significantly warmer in Roman and Medieval times.

Study: Earth was warmer in Roman, Medieval times
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/13/study-earth-was-warmer-in-roman-medieval-times/#!