No, this is wrong. The CO2 goes into the air, increasing the levels, then SOME goes into the biosphere. The author of this is an idiot. More crap from a Koch bro funded website.
Totally fucking wrong. You are an evil liar. Please kill yourself now. The Koch bros would be the only ones to mourn you.
and its shows co2 trailing ocean temps and land temps. that is why you have a cheap little slanted cut away view. its for you lefties that don't take the time to understand the science. oh look a the scary picture from the screwed up perspective.
No you evil liar. Temps and CO2 are in synch. Kill yourself now. As one can see here. CO2 has lead temps higher
of course it goes into the air.... but if you really want to learn something... understand this chart. you see the uptake line rising to match the green line. you see the annual carbon increase line. well take that line down to the next chart. you see how it matches up ocean sea surface temperature. Do you understand the implication is that ocean sea surface temps drive co2 levels and why? If you read the article you will learn something. Stop being so ignorant... and admit you do not know anything about what co2 does in our atmosphere. http://notrickszone.com/2013/10/08/...emperature-is-driving-co2-and-not-vice-versa/
you are a corrupt son of a bitch. where did you find a chart missing the last 5 to 10 years of data? even john cook on the website sponsored by al gore admits that co2 trails temps in the temperature record. http://www.skepticalscience.com/Why-does-CO2-lag-temperature.html Why does CO2 lag temperature? Posted on 9 January 2010 by John Cook Over the last half million years, our climate has experienced long ice ages regularly punctuated by brief warm periods called interglacials. Atmospheric carbon dioxide closely matches the cycle, increasing by around 80 to 100 parts per million as Antarctic temperatures warm up to 10°C. However, when you look closer, CO2 actually lags temperature by around 1000 years. While this result was predicted two decades ago (Lorius 1990), it still surprises and confuses many.
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/FlaticecoreCO2.pdf Fc don't you get tired of just lying your ass off and being wrong every time you argue with me. There is a reason for it. I have science to back up my statements or I tell you its my opinion. When you make factual statements you should try and google it to make sure. http://icecap.us/images/uploads/FlaticecoreCO2.pdf It appears from this graph that CO2 concentrations follows temperature with a lag of approximately 6-9 months. The interesting part is off course that the CO2 trends so markedly responds to temperature changes. I wanted to get a clearer picture of this relationship, and thus took approximately 20 datasets from this graph: